Pro-95
Member
I posted this information in the Nevada Roll Call thread:
So far the only areas where there seems to be activity on the NSRS is what is shared on the Washoe County EDACS system. The other seemingly operational sites are only carrying NHP Reno traffic. I did have some traffic on talkgroups that were apparently NDOT Roads while near the Currie site but there was no traffic on the return trip indicating that the site was either off or the agencies were not using it.
While overnighting in Elko I heard several changes in the CC on the freqs around Elko. I could almost say with certainty that there was testing and evaluation going on as only Elko Central seemed to stay up and Elko West/East was up, then down and up then down and changing CC (buzzsaw) noises cycling through the frequencies. Even still there was no local NHP, NDOT traffic heard while in Elko, only the NSRS NHP that is simulcast and shared licenses with Washoe County.
I did pick up spurious traffic on the "old" 150Mhz State frequencies that was apparently NHP and the occasional NDOT Roads. These were broadcast in the clear and not trunked.
Which brings up an interesting point. If two agencies want to piggy-back / simulcast on each others sites, which makes sense for interoperability, how can they license the same freqs at the same site for two seperate entities? This seems like it would create a confusion????
Any more news?
What I'd like to do is list what news or discoveries regarding the NSRS you find in this thread so we can all keep abreast of what is happening.The State has seemingly abandoned, for the lack of a better term, the statewide EDACS. I just travelled across the state and found most listed freqs inactive or completely wrong (CC) freqs or order, but with nothing being broadcast. I even watched an NHP officer come up from behind and pull someone over. I had a full minute of time in which there should have been activity on the NSRS site I was currently monitoring and nothing. I saw him speak into the mic and still nothing. I am currently picking up NHP on 154 MHZ which is simulcast here on Washoe Countys EDACS. Even when the NSRS appeared to be working the only real traffic was the 753 talkgroup which is Reno NHP simulcasts on the Washoe County EDACS even though I was 400 miles aways from Reno. With that in mind I should be able to monitor NHP in Las Vegas from Reno or anywhere else in the state for that matter. The statewide radio system is apparently not working as planned and even though there seems to be everything in place the agencies are not using it. I have some strings I can pull at the State so maybe I can get some answers but I fear that a bonafide answer still eludes even the state at this point.
When the freqs and system is known, you will find the correct frequencies here at the Radio Reference Database.
So far the only areas where there seems to be activity on the NSRS is what is shared on the Washoe County EDACS system. The other seemingly operational sites are only carrying NHP Reno traffic. I did have some traffic on talkgroups that were apparently NDOT Roads while near the Currie site but there was no traffic on the return trip indicating that the site was either off or the agencies were not using it.
While overnighting in Elko I heard several changes in the CC on the freqs around Elko. I could almost say with certainty that there was testing and evaluation going on as only Elko Central seemed to stay up and Elko West/East was up, then down and up then down and changing CC (buzzsaw) noises cycling through the frequencies. Even still there was no local NHP, NDOT traffic heard while in Elko, only the NSRS NHP that is simulcast and shared licenses with Washoe County.
I did pick up spurious traffic on the "old" 150Mhz State frequencies that was apparently NHP and the occasional NDOT Roads. These were broadcast in the clear and not trunked.
Which brings up an interesting point. If two agencies want to piggy-back / simulcast on each others sites, which makes sense for interoperability, how can they license the same freqs at the same site for two seperate entities? This seems like it would create a confusion????
Any more news?