richardc63 said:
N Jay,
Whether these radios comply with the TETRA standard or not is not as important as the fact they are based on TDMA, as is TETRA. There are significant similiarities between these radios and TETRA, and it seems rather odd that senior Motorola staff who I have spoken to do not attempt to dispell any talk that they are "TETRA".
That they don't dispell any talk doesn't have to mean anything but if you check the Motorola link in grem467's post you will see that the MOTOTRBO radios are based on a standard different than TETRA.
As such I disagree that it is important that both standards are based on TDMA - GSM for example is also TDMA-based, and so are many other technologies, including non-radio ones. In fact one might think TETRA borrowed heavily from GSM, and you probably wouldn't be that wrong.
So even there is some relation between the technologies and/or standards it doesn't imply any compability or that they are one and the same. In fact I don't see a need for any vendor to dispell any talk if they state their radio is based on standard A, because that (normally) means it's not based on standard B, C, D ...
It is a FACT that Motorola are actively marketing TETRA here in Australia along side their APCO line of products. If Motorola is nothing else, they certainly are pragmatic.
Regards,
Richard
Motorola only markets TETRA where they have to, i.e. where the tender specifications / technical requirements insist on the same. Otherwise they promote their proprietary systems (typically iDen outside of the US).