• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

New to GMRS - Few Questions

Status
Not open for further replies.

emsflyer84

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 22, 2012
Messages
411
Location
Central NH
Ok, so I’ve been using Amateur radio for a while now, not a heavy user by any means and still consider myself pretty green in that field as well, even though I’ve had my license for a few years. Just got my GMRS because I joined a local off-roading / overland group and GMRS is the radio standard for group rides. Now I’m looking to get more into GMRS but I’m finding out a few things….. Seems to me like GMRS is really better for specific use cases, when more then one person who know each other are using the system for a specific purpose. There are a few open repeaters around me but it seems like I need permission to use them. I’ve requested that but haven’t had any responses. I get the logic, the repeaters are privately owned, sometimes for family use and people might not want a bunch random people taking up their air time. So the sense I’m getting is that GMRS isn’t so much for random people like like me to jump on and chat with strangers. Just getting my feet wet and curious to learn more, let me know if I’m on track here!
 

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,666
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
There are a few open repeaters around me but it seems like I need permission to use them. I’ve requested that but haven’t had any responses. I get the logic, the repeaters are privately owned, sometimes for family use and people might not want a bunch random people taking up their air time.
Yet the GMRS rules do not allow for coordination of repeaters, so every licensee must share all frequencies. A repeater owner can limit the use, but legally can't ban you from a repeater pair, unlike part 97 which does allow for a repeater owner or trustee to order one to "stay off" and go so far as to make an FCC complaint if rules or wishes of the owner aren't followed.

The spirit of GMRS is for family communications, but nothing in the actual rules prohibits non-related persons from using the service. So long as everyone operates within the part 95 rules as written and is authorized under a licensee, one can communicate with "random strangers".
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
25,293
Location
United States
So the sense I’m getting is that GMRS isn’t so much for random people like like me to jump on and chat with strangers.

It's not CB. It's not amateur radio. I know people use it like that, and that is OK.

But you'll find that a lot of users, especially those that understand GMRS, set up CTCSS or DCS squelch on their radios so they specifically don't have to listen to other users. Makes it nice to be able to leave the radio on 24x7 and not hear unnecessary traffic.

Many years ago I had access to a very high level repeater. I was able to get a non-standard CTCSS code on that repeater just for my family use. Specifically did this so it would NOT be like CB radio.

Unless someone doesn't know how to set up CTCSS/DCS, or chooses not to, making random contacts won't be a common thing.

If you want random contacts, CB and ham are MUCH more suited for that.
 

MTS2000des

5B2_BEE00 Czar
Joined
Jul 12, 2008
Messages
5,666
Location
Cobb County, GA Stadium Crime Zone
Not to nitpick, but both CB and GMRS are governed under 47 CFR 95, which technically means they are one in the same with the core differences being frequency allocation and technical operating parameters (repeaters). Even the FCC states they are "similar" radio services.
CB is license by rule, whereas GMRS is an actual granted license. But when you start looking at the permissible uses, there isn't much difference, especially when it comes to sharing of allocated frequencies, permissible uses, etc.
 

smittie

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2019
Messages
169
Location
Dillon, Montana
So the sense I’m getting is that GMRS isn’t so much for random people like like me to jump on and chat with strangers.
With regard to repeaters, it depends on the repeater. There are a number of repeaters along the Interstate that I travel often that are open for anyone to use. I have talked with "random people" on those repeaters almost every time I go through that area. I found myGMRS.com: GMRS Repeater Directory and Community useful in knowing which repeaters are available for public use and what the settings are.
I also joined an organization that runs a number of repeaters down in Arizona.
So, it depends on the repeater and its owner.
 

merlin

Active Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
3,124
Location
DN32su
Of the 30 GMRS channels, 1 through 14 are shared with FRS. 15 to 22 are simplex/ repeater outputs.
15R to 22R are duplex repeater channels.
Channel 1 is sort of self proclaimed 'calling channel' and 20/20R is roadside assistance.
Where I live, there seems to be no repeaters in usable range, but there are a good number of business/families and about all
utilize CTCSS/DCS
Channel 3 is busy most of the day and channel 8 has a share, sometimes channel 1.
Some legal notes, Channels 1 through 7 is restricted to 5 watts. Channels 8 through 14 is .5 watts.
15 through 22 is 50 watts.
 

sallen07

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
1,248
Location
Rochester, NY

Peter_SD911

Scan Sexy
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
161
Location
Surfridge, CA.

smittie

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2019
Messages
169
Location
Dillon, Montana
Why not just eliminate confusion like us "old class A goats" do...

We use the last 3/4/ or 5 numbers of the actual freq.

ie: "675"
or "5875"
or "7.5625"

Never any confusion with that format.
Might not be any confusion among "old class A goats". There would be nothing but confusion among the off-road crowd that has adopted GMRS/FRS to replace CB as a primary communication. The channel structure referred to by @merlin is in common use. The only time there is any confusion is when the radio geeks insist on using frequency.
It all depends how one came into it and for what purpose. If RF as a hobby is the purpose, the frequency details are part of the fun. If the radio is just a tool to be used in pursuit of some other purpose, the frequency details are a relatively uninteresting detail. It would be nice if the FCC would put an official channel structure around it. Midland did it for them.

Smittie
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top