Spec said:
I have manually put in 5 EDACS, 2 LTR, and 6 Conventional "SYSTEMS" in so far. Yes ,that is without software. VERY labor intensive, but I do know how to use all the features now. A great radio. Very different from the many others I have had. While I'm not big on hand-helds, I beleive this radio is in a class of it's own. If Uniden can come out with a "base" type unit that compares to it that would be fantastic.
I'll go along with Spec on this. Read the manual! Also, I strongly suggest putting at least one or two systems in manually so that you know how to do it. The day may come when you need to slap a system in there quickly and don't have the computer handy to do it.
My '396 is great. It has not replaced my Pro-96, but is rather an addition to it.
Also, oddly enough, I have not found any other scanner antennae that make enough of a difference that I want to use one of them instead of the stock antenna. This is
highly unusual; generally, the stock antenna that comes with the radio is a piece of garbage, but the Pro-96 and now the BC-396 have both come out with a stock antenna that is quite acceptable and performs well enough that I have no problem using it day to day.
My next trick: trying out the pager tone feature. I've already recorded fire radio traffic several days running with Scanner Recorder, stuck the result into Cool Edit 2000 and used the analysis feature of CE2k to verify tone frequencies. I've already got most of Central Ohio figured out. Fun!
Tom WA8PYR