Nebbybiotch
Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2023
- Messages
- 5
Please any help will be appreciated. Thanks.
1st of all hello and thank you for such a quick responses.Please any help will be appreciated. Thanks.
1st of all hello and thank you for such a quick responses.
My location is Orange county New York. 75 miles north of NY City. Interested in fire , police, EMS, maybe some local department of transportation & airports. I am willing to buy more than needed as to potentially " future proof" much as possible for future changes such as different interest or technology. Again thank you.
Regards to encryption how is it legal? I thought the laws were written for we as citizens have the legal rights to monitor our local & state communities.Please any help will be appreciated. Thanks.
Unfortunately you thought wrong.Regards to encryption how is it legal? I thought the laws were written for we as citizens have the legal rights to monitor our local & state communities.


Orange County public safety agencies operate on the 700/800 MHz CoRNet P25 Phase II system, which is simulcast (2 cells, north and south). The Uniden SDS series are the only scanners that were designed specifically to properly decode P25 simulcast modulation, and would be your best bet for monitoring that system. You likely won't be satisfied with any of the other scanners you mentioned, as they tend to fall short of providing reliable decoding of P25 simulcast modulation, despite what some others may claim.1st of all hello and thank you for such a quick responses.
My location is Orange county New York. 75 miles north of NY City. Interested in fire , police, EMS, maybe some local department of transportation & airports. I am willing to buy more than needed as to potentially " future proof" much as possible for future changes such as different interest or technology. Again thank you.
I completely agree with GTR8000 and Whiskey3JMC. My SDS100 performs very well on the new P25 Phase II system currently being rolled out in Broome County. Some of the conflicting reports of BCD436/536 Phase II performance are due to the fact that when used in a location very close to one of the towers that is also shielded from the other towers these scanners can do fairly well. I live less than a mile from the nearest tower and at home my 436's performance just about matches that of my SDS100. However, when I tried both scanners at a central location within eyesight of multiple towers the 436 performance was mediocre while the SDS100 reception was still excellent. Go with one of the SDS scanners.You likely won't be satisfied with any of the other scanners you mentioned, as they tend to fall short of providing reliable decoding of P25 simulcast modulation, despite what some others may claim.