Nimitz Carrier Handheld Radio

Status
Not open for further replies.

RaleighGuy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
16,403
Location
Raleigh, NC
Rear Adm. Jim Kirk, commander, Nimitz Carrier Strike Group, spoke with President Joe Biden during a conference call aboard the aircraft carrier USS Nimitz (CVN 68) during Superbowl LV. Keeping his radio close by in case he needed to handle any ship board situation.

Nimitz Radio.jpg
 

krokus

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
6,219
Location
Southeastern Michigan
My carrier used a Motorola UHF trunked system, with distributed antennas, and was called "MOMS Radio". It allowed comms for the crew in most of the ship, excluding some sensitive areas, where radios were not allowed.
 

PACNWDude

Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
1,458
Very interesting. In a previous life, and maintaining comms on a fleet of dedicated oil spill response ships, we were replacing legacy UHF gear with 800MHz as it worked a lot better between decks and on large steel vessels. Did not expect to see UHF on a carrier in the present day. Thank you for sharing these pictures.
 

ecps92

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2002
Messages
15,469
Location
Taxachusetts
the Federal Government has no allocations at 700/800/900 for LMR - most of the LMR they have [IMHO from monitoring] and use on-board is
400-420, 380-400, 457/467 [Yes same as Cruise/Cargo], 162-174 [Rare], 148-150.7 [Rare] and 138-144 [Rare]

Searching just the trunked info in the RRDB


Very interesting. In a previous life, and maintaining comms on a fleet of dedicated oil spill response ships, we were replacing legacy UHF gear with 800MHz as it worked a lot better between decks and on large steel vessels. Did not expect to see UHF on a carrier in the present day. Thank you for sharing these pictures.
 

n4jri

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 10, 2004
Messages
1,672
Location
Richmond, VA
I'm curious about the architecture of some of these 406-420 radios. Down here, the only HYDRA I can ID is in the 380 range. But I've found a number of Motorola 3600 baud systems still in use in the 406 band. Have noticed in at least one case that offsets between transmit & receive freq are not consistent. (406.650out/416.475in, 408.850out/416.600in, and 407.075out/416.675in) Of course, they could be images, but again not a consistent relationship between input and output. Have not heard anything but control channels or dead carrier on 408.700. A number of systems also list 408.125, but I've only heard that freq in use on a P25 system using these same output freqs. (am presuming that on P25, there has to be a fixed offset interval between TX & RX freqs.)

73/Allen (N4JRI)
 

ecps92

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2002
Messages
15,469
Location
Taxachusetts
Don't rule out the 457/467 band either for some USN/USNS

Altho a much in need of an update web site this might help on HYDRA

And many of these systems have been around/in service, LONG before the 9 mhz NTIA split was implemented, so YMMV from that aspect

I'm curious about the architecture of some of these 406-420 radios. Down here, the only HYDRA I can ID is in the 380 range. But I've found a number of Motorola 3600 baud systems still in use in the 406 band. Have noticed in at least one case that offsets between transmit & receive freq are not consistent. (406.650out/416.475in, 408.850out/416.600in, and 407.075out/416.675in) Of course, they could be images, but again not a consistent relationship between input and output. Have not heard anything but control channels or dead carrier on 408.700. A number of systems also list 408.125, but I've only heard that freq in use on a P25 system using these same output freqs. (am presuming that on P25, there has to be a fixed offset interval between TX & RX freqs.)

73/Allen (N4JRI)
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top