North Alabama agencies to stop using "10-Codes"?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 23, 2003
Messages
627
Reaction score
0
According to a report from WHNT TV 19 in Huntsville, North Alabama
agencies will be required to switch from "10-Codes" and "Signals" to
"Plain-Talk" for most radio communications.
This is reportedly due to a lack of communication between local agencies
that use completely different codes.
According to this report aired on 5/18/05 @ 18:00CDT, agencies will
have to use a COMMON code or NONE at all if they are to recieve Federal
funds after January 2006.
Homeland Security has reportedly mandated the change.
Is the problem codes & signals or incompatible radio systems! :?:
 

BiGtRuNk

Member
Joined
May 19, 2005
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Location
Alabama
From what I have been told about this is Homeland Security want's 10-Codes to become nationalized. Instead of being more "State Controlled".
:roll:
 

INDY72

Monitoring since 1982, using radios since 1991.
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
15,140
Reaction score
1,964
Location
Indianapolis, IN
Yes HomeSec wants to iether have ONE nationalized standard for them or to use plain talk so that everyone can understand each other for interop.
 

emcom

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
213
Reaction score
6
Location
Huntsville, Alabama
Common terminology or clear voice communications is something that is required under the National Incident Management System (NIMS). It will primarily effect the communications during an actual incident where the Incident Command System (ICS) is used involving multiple agencies.....however, in real-life, you are going to revert back to what you do on a daily basis....if you use 10 codes every day - it will be hard to instanly switch to clear voice during an incident IMHO. That is why a lot of people are talking about using clear voice daily.

From FEMA's FAQ page on NIMS:

"According to the NIMS: "Incident communications are facilitated through the development and use of a common communications plan and interoperable communications processes and architectures. This integrated approach links the operational and support units of the various agencies involved and is necessary to maintain communications connectivity and discipline and enable common situational awareness and interaction."

The ability to communicate within ICS is absolutely critical and using standard or common terminology is essential to ensuring efficient, clear communication. ICS requires the use of common terminology; that is, the use of plain English. Common terminology in communications is necessary to support mutual aid and the infusion of new responders coming to an event so they will be able to communicate with one another. All exercises that responders participate in should feature plain English commands so they can function in a multi-jurisdiction environment. Field manuals and training should also be revised to reflect the plain English standard. That said, it is the intention of the NIMS Integration Center to take a practical common sense approach to this, and not cut off funding to a city because we hear of first responder who happens use ten codes."


Another reference from FEMA's site:


NIMS Document Chapter V (B)(1)(b): "Incident Communications
These will follow the standards called for under the ICS. The IC manages
communications at an incident, using a common communications plan and an
incident-based communications center established solely for use by the command,
tactical, and support resources assigned to the incident. All entities involved
in managing the incident will utilize common terminology, prescribed by the NIMS,
for communications.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top