NWS S.A.M.E. Codes

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
996
Reaction score
7
Location
Ohio
I was wondering how wide are the 10 Weather Frequencies in Megacycles?
Also, how wide is the datastream that they use to activate the S.A.M.E. codes in our recievers?
 

Voyager

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Messages
12,058
Reaction score
53
JerryNone said:
I was wondering how wide are the 10 Weather Frequencies in Megacycles?
Also, how wide is the datastream that they use to activate the S.A.M.E. codes in our recievers?

They are standard NBFM (NarrowBand FM) that is +/- 5 kHz deviation with 3 kHz maxumum frequency, so the bandwidth would be 16 kHz.

The datastream is no more than 5 kHz deviation, and is likely 3 kHz with roughly 2000 Hz maximum frequency, so that would be about 10 kHz bandwidth maximum.

So, how wide are they in MHz? About 0.016 MHz.

They range from 162.400 MHz to 162.550 MHz in the USA. (in 25 kHz steps)

Joe M.
 

Joseph11

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
2,274
Reaction score
4
This reminds me, is anyone thinking of making a SAME decoder for Windows? It would be interesting to be able to decode SAME data right in Windows, wouldn't it? You set your scanner to your local NOAA frequency and connect it to your computer from your discriminator output.
 

K5MAR

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2002
Messages
2,265
Reaction score
14
Location
Stillwater, OK
Joseph11 said:
This reminds me, is anyone thinking of making a SAME decoder for Windows? It would be interesting to be able to decode SAME data right in Windows, wouldn't it? You set your scanner to your local NOAA frequency and connect it to your computer from your discriminator output.

Wouldn't it be easier to buy a weather radio with a computer interface and software, such as the Radio Shack 12-258? It's discontinued, but still widely available in the stores. Computer programable (software included), and pops up the weather alerts for your selected counties on your monitor. I have this model and really like it. I'm sure there are others on the market.

Mark S.
 

Joseph11

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
2,274
Reaction score
4
It'll be eaiser, but not as fun. Software would be cheaper or free too.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
996
Reaction score
7
Location
Ohio
K5MAR said:
Joseph11 said:
This reminds me, is anyone thinking of making a SAME decoder for Windows? It would be interesting to be able to decode SAME data right in Windows, wouldn't it? You set your scanner to your local NOAA frequency and connect it to your computer from your discriminator output.

Wouldn't it be easier to buy a weather radio with a computer interface and software, such as the Radio Shack 12-258? It's discontinued, but still widely available in the stores. Computer programable (software included), and pops up the weather alerts for your selected counties on your monitor. I have this model and really like it. I'm sure there are others on the market.

Mark S.

Does the software work with Windows 2003? How much is he software?
 

Joseph11

Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2004
Messages
2,274
Reaction score
4
JerryNone said:
Does the software work with Windows 2003? How much is he software?

You'd need the hardware too, but it should work on Windows Server 2003. Windows Server 2003 is basically Windows NT 5.2.
 

Arvetus

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2005
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Location
Lufkin, TX
I see that some of the mobile scanners have the ability to use SAME technology. I have a question on this.

I'm looking at getting a scanner of that type to use instead of carrying my Yaesu VX-7 and a weather radio in the car, along with my mobile transceiver. Now, my question is this. Does the scanner constantly monitor the NWS frequencies in the background and then sound an alert when something comes across? OR, do you have to put a local NWS frequency in your frequencies to be scanned in order for it to pick it up?
 

loumaag

Silent Key - Aug 2014
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
12,935
Reaction score
11
Location
Katy, TX
Arvetus said:
... Does the scanner constantly monitor the NWS frequencies in the background and then sound an alert when something comes across? OR, do you have to put a local NWS frequency in your frequencies to be scanned in order for it to pick it up?
Depends on what you are looking for. If you want SAME codes recognized, you must lock it on WX watch or what ever it is called for your scanner. If you are just interested in hearing any alert, then you can put it as the PRI channel and it will go off anytime the regular alert tone is sounded.
 

K5MAR

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2002
Messages
2,265
Reaction score
14
Location
Stillwater, OK
JerryNone said:
K5MAR said:
Joseph11 said:
This reminds me, is anyone thinking of making a SAME decoder for Windows? It would be interesting to be able to decode SAME data right in Windows, wouldn't it? You set your scanner to your local NOAA frequency and connect it to your computer from your discriminator output.

Wouldn't it be easier to buy a weather radio with a computer interface and software, such as the Radio Shack 12-258? It's discontinued, but still widely available in the stores. Computer programable (software included), and pops up the weather alerts for your selected counties on your monitor. I have this model and really like it. I'm sure there are others on the market.

Mark S.

Does the software work with Windows 2003? How much is he software?

Software included. According to the manual, it works with 98SE/ME/2000/XP.

Mark S.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
996
Reaction score
7
Location
Ohio
I have noticed that the Pro-96 tells you how much of the recieved signal it is receiving in Percentage. I was curious as to how well your WX Radio has to recieve the WX Frequencies in order to decode the data stream and t oactivate the alert function.
 

loumaag

Silent Key - Aug 2014
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
12,935
Reaction score
11
Location
Katy, TX
JerryNone said:
I have noticed that the Pro-96 tells you how much of the recieved signal it is receiving in Percentage. I was curious as to how well your WX Radio has to recieve the WX Frequencies in order to decode the data stream and t oactivate the alert function.
The Pro-96 does not show received signal strengh. It does have a CC Decoding Accuracy Percentage for TRS's, which obviously is not related to any conventional channel, including WX.
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
996
Reaction score
7
Location
Ohio
Ah, okay. Control Channel decoding. Thanks. But I am still curious as to how much of a singal strength your WX radio has to recieve in order in order to decode the data stram and activate the Alert Function.
 

K5MAR

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2002
Messages
2,265
Reaction score
14
Location
Stillwater, OK
JerryNone said:
Ah, okay. Control Channel decoding. Thanks. But I am still curious as to how much of a singal strength your WX radio has to recieve in order in order to decode the data stram and activate the Alert Function.

Hard to say. Previously, I was in the fringe reception range for the site that covered my county, and sometimes I couldn't even hear the transmitter. Now, with a new 1000 watt transmitter just north of town, I don't even have to pull out the antenna to get a full quieting signal.

Mark S.
 

Voyager

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2002
Messages
12,058
Reaction score
53
JerryNone said:
Ah, okay. Control Channel decoding. Thanks. But I am still curious as to how much of a singal strength your WX radio has to recieve in order in order to decode the data stram and activate the Alert Function.

It likely goes pretty low. I know modern scanners can pick up a CDCSS code lower than you can understand what is being said.

I know my WX alert has gone off and the signal is pretty well in the mud. That goes for the old 1050 Hz alerts, too, not just SAME.

Joe M.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top