SMA or BNC
Not sure how this topic has gone on, I haven't read all the posts to catch up. Sorry, I should, but there are too many with subjects that just don't really apply and until the radio hits the streets, the second guessing (UPman you are the exception) is not always worth the reading (though this IMHO is).
There was a topic earlier today, on SMA connectors (forget where it was) and someone mentioned that the 396 will have the SMA rather than a BNC.
Uniden, I hope the engineer that thought that one up is looking for a new job. I personnaly do not want to go out an buy a new set of antennae to support the 396. I like to use an antenna more tuned for the frequency range I am listening to, so I change routinely. I have a fairly substantial collection of antenna for my BNC radios.
I think we all know there is no single antenna that is good for all bands, especially in the rubber duckie world. Yes, SMA might be doing well in the ham world, but how often does an ham change antennae? SMA might be okay for a base/mobil unit that doesn't get changed very often. But on a handheld with MULTIPLE bands, threads are DUMB.
Well, if this is the case, I may have to open the scanner and put a BNC in place of the SMA. Hopefully the access will be farily simple.
Yes, I also know I can get and adapter, but that is (as one other person has noted) extra strain on the radio and (haven't seen this mentioned) added loss in the signal.
Please, someone tell me by not reading the entire set of threads here, that I am wrong, that Uniden removed their heads from their (never mind) and the 396 will have a BNC connector (posts dated 1 April saying so will be discounted as April Fools)