Ok, I'm bummed and confused...

Status
Not open for further replies.

b52hbuff

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,755
Reaction score
76
The informaion on Lawrence Livermore labs has been removed.

So I have read the board's policy regarding federal system informaion.
I don't understand it. Why honor federal requests and not those from
municipal and county administrators. Aren't the local systems just as
'critical' as the federal ones?

As Lindsay states on the page. If you want a 'secure' system, then
deploy a secure system.
 

Pro-95

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2004
Messages
798
Reaction score
0
Location
Washoe Valley Nevada
The LLL info has been removed from this site as requested. However the search feature of a scanner is a powerful tool. ;)

Secondly do you really, really think any "sensitive" information would be broadcast in the open? More likely than not it would be move this widget here and there is a leak in toilet 7 lav 9b. ;)
 

NMPhillieFan

Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2004
Messages
298
Reaction score
18
Location
New Mexico
I cant speak for all federal systems, but I used to monitor a Federal Penitentiary that uses no encryption (as of 2/04). You hear everything from day to day ops to Prisoner Movements outside the facility. This includes SORT team operations...

About 15 miles away is another federal complex, same deal...all open air, no encryption.

I do not see either site listed on here, but they are easily found and very entertaining.
 

b52hbuff

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,755
Reaction score
76
Pro-95 said:
The LLL info has been removed from this site as requested. However the search feature of a scanner is a powerful tool. ;)

Secondly do you really, really think any "sensitive" information would be broadcast in the open? More likely than not it would be move this widget here and there is a leak in toilet 7 lav 9b. ;)

#1. The board is a great reference. I think your arguement could be
applied to any system. So why have the board if we can all search...

#2. If the system isn't used to transmit sensitive data, then why buckle
and retract the information on the board?
 

blantonl

Founder and CEO
Staff member
Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 9, 2000
Messages
11,916
Reaction score
7,621
Location
Dallas, TX
I understand your frustration... however, remember that the Feds / Mil folks could very easily make my life miserable.....even if it is legal. All it takes is one hot-shot fed/mil guy to make a name for himself, and I could be subject of a lengthy process that me, and my family cannot afford.

Most Fed / Mil stuff that comes from "official sources" - i.e. - someone on the inside, is classified information, and I could get in a lot of trouble for posting classified information. I wanted to provide an "out" to the Fed / Mil folks.

Local / State / etc don't have much jurisdiction over this site.

The other side of the coin is that those fed/mil admins that submit letters asking for the information to be removed will have their letter posted for the entire world to see --- meaning, public scrutiny can be fairly eye opening for those admins.
 

BobWeb

Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2003
Messages
434
Reaction score
0
Location
Thornton, CO
blantonl said:
The other side of the coin is that those fed/mil admins that submit letters asking for the information to be removed will have their letter posted for the entire world to see --- meaning, public scrutiny can be fairly eye opening for those admins.

Where are these posted Lindsay? I looked all over and can't find them.
 

ECPD279

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 9, 2002
Messages
820
Reaction score
57
Location
Bay Area, CA
I am truly amazed that these few letters are all you've gotten Lindsay. I guess maybe some communications managers are not as paranoid as others. Or maybe they don't know about the site yet? At any rate, I can live with fewer federal systems if it allows the rest of the info to remain on this site. Good job Lindsay, keep it up, we all appreciate your efforts.
 

WayneH

Forums Veteran
Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 16, 2000
Messages
7,555
Reaction score
95
Location
Your master site
b52hbuff said:
The information on Lawrence Livermore labs has been removed.
Unfortunately, but why not just ask a question within the forums and maybe someone knowledgeable on the system will answer up? ;) 8)

I honor Lindsay's choices so just the same I won't happen to give a detailed analysis of the system at the same time it's removed without his permission.

-Wayne
 

unitcharlie

a Kentucky DB Admin...
Joined
Jan 2, 2003
Messages
2,853
Reaction score
3
Location
far from Nonesuch, Ky...
with apoloigies.....

lindsay would be between a rock and a grounding rod for sure.... please post these letters so all of us may see.... and maybe make some calls to congress....
 

loumaag

Silent Key - Aug 2014
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
12,935
Reaction score
11
Location
Katy, TX
The letters are posted on the site. Just as they were when the site was Trunked Radio Net. You can find them here, and for future reference, drill down from the "Legal & Other" link on the home page. :)
 

b52hbuff

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,755
Reaction score
76
blantonl said:
I understand your frustration... however, remember that the Feds / Mil folks could very easily make my life miserable.....even if it is legal. All it takes is one hot-shot fed/mil guy to make a name for himself, and I could be subject of a lengthy process that me, and my family cannot afford.

Most Fed / Mil stuff that comes from "official sources" - i.e. - someone on the inside, is classified information, and I could get in a lot of trouble for posting classified information. I wanted to provide an "out" to the Fed / Mil folks.

Local / State / etc don't have much jurisdiction over this site.

Post 9/11 and Patriot Act, why do you think you'd be less immune from
the local authorities?

As far as classified information, could you just leave up the base and
offset information? That is 'easily' provable to be derived from
'non-classified' information. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top