Yes but they knew about some of the spots and they could have done a better job of testing.Maybe you are not reading this the same way I am.
Sounds like the original contract required;
1) 95% mobile coverage countywide.
2) 95% portable coverage, plus 12 dB margin for building penetration within the city
The BDAs appear to be an additional solution to specific coverage issues not anticipated in the contract.
How is this any type of rewording?
This is all quite common.
Specific site testing is relatively uncommon due to the cost and difficulty.Yes but they knew about some of the spots and they could have done a better job of testing.
Some, but very few do it that way.Other agencies do it. Washington county did specific site testing for their new P25 system.
Maybe so (maybe not), but that is a different issue.This project was a cluster **** from the begining. Too bad they are to deep into now.