Mike_Oxlong said:
As for Ottawa fire switching, unless Fleetnet was built out to give portable coverage in Ottawa (and there's been no mention of it), it's unlikely they will be switching.
Why would they switch when they have a perfectly good system already in use and paid for?
I'm not saying I think "Wreckmaster" you are deliberately trying to fool
us, but looks like somebody's factual wires have been crossed somewhere.
You might in future want to float this a question before making it sound
like fact.
We have heard nothing of this from the Fleetnet end nor the OFS end.
That would be most strange. Guelph is the only FD on Fleetnet so far,
and it was part of a pilot. The publicity folks would be on top of this one
bigtime.
I see no indication that the current system is not working well. To
duplicate handheld/indoor coverage on Fleetnet would require extra
towers (unlikely) and vehicle repeaters. The current EDACS system
uses many (17?) sites and VRs which are not cheap, for this coverage.
Fleetnet would have to add extra channels to each site; five channels
were added to the main EDACS site just before OFS went on.
All taxpayers in Ottawa are paying for this system and if City Council
mysteriously decided to pull OFS out, and managed to slip the costs by,
right now I would be marching on City Hall demanding that part of my
taxes be returned.
Even if this switch were going to happen, most people who can hear
OFS on EDACS could also hear them on Fleetnet (except to PRO-93/95s
and the like) , if they were analog; or at worst, a digital scanner if not
encrypted. Encryption costs the users extra money. I'd be more
concerned about them switching to ProVoice on the current system (but
why would they do that?).
Another point....you say OPS is Provoice/encrypted. How would the
average person know if it's encrypted or clear? Etrunk S/W can't tell
because it can't. Just curious. And what do you mean by the "new city
switchover"?
Dave