nd5y
Member
Can the database handle a P25 trunked system where all the sites are numbered RFSS 1 Site 1 but each site has a different system ID?
There is a system in west Texas like that.I don't think each site can have a different system ID. Would not make sense if part of same system.
There is a system in west Texas like that.
Each site shows WACN BEE00 RFSS 001 Site 001
The only thing that changes are the control channel frequencies and the system IDs.
I saw five sites this morning with SIDs 3E0, 3E1, 3E2, 3E3 and 3E4.
Most of the frequencies match up with this system https://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=8350 which doesn't even have a WACN or SID listed.
No. Each site I have seen only broadcasts one active primary CC and one alternate CC. It's not like a Harris system. The other strange thing is none of the sites broadcast a neighbor list.none of the site frequencies are marked as primary or alternate CCs (so obviously all need to be considered as CCs)?
This system has not been networked due to lack of funding. So each site is operational in Site Trunking and each site has its own system ID. I don't know when/if it will ever be connected to a switch. Concho Valley COG is the system licensee and it was originally intended to be a regional system. The site info listed in the database is correct for frequencies
This system has not been networked due to lack of funding. So each site is operational in Site Trunking and each site has its own system ID. I don't know when/if it will ever be connected to a switch. Concho Valley COG is the system licensee and it was originally intended to be a regional system. The site info listed in the database is correct for frequencies
Looks like everything current in the DB as of right now is directly off of an FCC license. Every frequency, even the FX1 frequencies (added as a site). No indication of a control channel. If it were in Site Trunking, there ought to be a control channel for each of those sites.
1-010 / 1-017 duplicated
1-008 / 1-016 duplicated
1-007 / 1-015 duplicated
1-002 / 1-014 duplicated
1-004 / 1-013 duplicated
1-003 / 1-012 duplicated
1-005 / 1-011 duplicated
1-001 listing FX1 frequencies
Again, it looks like somebody looked at two licenses, and then made up everything on the fly based upon the licenses. As i recall, only _confirmed_active_ sites are supposed to be listed in the DB and sites_with_no_location are not supposed to be in the DB.
Either that whole thing is cobbled together in the worst fashion, or that database entry doesn't even deserve to be seen by the public due to errors and omissions. Yowsa.
Mike
PS: Yep, I'm far far away from Texas, but this mess caught my attention so I'm chiming in.
What about confirmed sites with an active control channel but no exact known location?only _confirmed_active_ sites are supposed to be listed in the DB and sites_with_no_location are not supposed to be in the DB.
What system would that be?I and another person in the DFW area are trying to get a bogus DMR system out of the DB but not having much luck.
I missed this part the other day...The site info listed in the database is correct for frequencies
It was called Airtime communications.
Heres a link to us discussing it.
https://forums.radioreference.com/t...cations-system-dmr-questions.html#post2659151
Link to system
https://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=9000
But it looks like its been removed from the Dallas county page.
I dont want to hijack this thread.
OK, I'll have to give this some thought. . . .