Curious if you'll be able to receive a particular location? This tool is handy to see if the are any significant topographical barriers between you and a site. HeyWhatsThat Path Profiler
FYI,
1.76 is appearing to be online according to 1.65, the status changed today.
2019/02/05 23:04:11 Freq=153.447500 NAC=943 Current site: BEE00.942-1.65 LANC33 Truce/Lancaster
2019/02/05 23:04:27 Freq=153.447500 NAC=943 BEE00.942-1.65 neighbor: Site BEE00.942-1.64; CC=4-1409 153.5225 LANC01 Cornwall/Lancaster
2019/02/05 23:04:28 Freq=153.447500 NAC=943 BEE00.942-1.65 neighbor: Site BEE00.942-1.76; CC=0-1381 859.6375 CHES01 800 Morgantown/Chester
2019/02/05 23:04:29 Freq=153.447500 NAC=943 BEE00.942-1.65 neighbor: Site BEE00.942-1.70; CC=5-2870 168.8750 CHES02 Devault/Chester
2019/02/05 23:04:31 Freq=153.447500 NAC=943 BEE00.942-1.65 neighbor: Site BEE00.942-1.69; CC=0-1217 858.6125 CHES96 800 Oxford/Chester FAILED, ISOLATED
2019/02/05 23:04:33 Freq=153.447500 NAC=943 BEE00.942-1.65 neighbor: Site BEE00.942-1.79; CC=5-2915 168.9875 CHES33 Hibernia/Chester
2019/02/05 23:04:39 Freq=153.447500 NAC=943 BEE00.942-1.65 neighbor: Site BEE00.942-1.58; CC=4-2178 155.4450 YORK16 Andersontown/York
Oops hadn't updated Sites list. This is correct
Site: 1.68 NAC=941 ; CHES31 800 Pocopson/Chester
Neighbor: BEE00.942-1.69 ; CHES96 800 Oxford/Chester
Neighbor: BEE00.942-1.75 ; CHES02 800 Devault/Chester
Neighbor: BEE00.942-1.76 ; CHES01 800 Morgantown/Chester
Channel 0-641: 855.0125 SCC
Channel 0-901: 856.6375 SCC
Channel 0-1221: 858.6375 CC
Site: 1.76 NAC=94C BSI=WRAL397 ; CHES01 800 Morgantown/Chester
Neighbor: BEE00.942-1.65 ; LANC33 Truce/Lancaster
Neighbor: BEE00.942-1.68 ; CHES31 800 Pocopson/Chester
Neighbor: BEE00.942-1.69 ; CHES96 800 Oxford/Chester
Neighbor: BEE00.942-1.75 ; CHES02 800 Devault/Chester
Channel 0-893: 856.5875 BSI
Channel 0-1053: 857.5875 CC SCC
Channel 0-1129: 858.0625 SCC
Channel 0-1381: 859.6375 CC
So, you are actually copying Morgantown then? I'll add it to the database.
Yeah, I'm posting false data again!.. It was added as a note to an existing submission that has been waiting for validation, since I have a reputation for submitting false data.?
I've never BS'd this stuff.. despite opinion to the contrary.. And have admitted when I know I'm wrong.. (No such admission is here, just a neighbor listed site had a wrong alpha tag.)
ACTUALLY DECODED
2019/02/07 20:26:41 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C Current site: 1.76
2019/02/07 20:26:43 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C Current network: BEE00.942 PA-STARNet
2019/02/07 20:26:48 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C Current site: BEE00.942-1.76 CHES01 800 Morgantown/Chester
2019/02/07 20:26:51 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C BEE00.942-1.76 neighbor: Site BEE00.942-1.68; CC=0-1221 858.6375 CHES31 800 Pocopson/Chester?
2019/02/07 20:26:52 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C BEE00.942-1.76 neighbor: Site BEE00.942-1.69; CC=0-1217 858.6125 CHES96 800 Oxford/Chester FAILED, ISOLATED
2019/02/07 20:26:54 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C BEE00.942-1.76 neighbor: Site BEE00.942-1.65; CC=4-1379 153.4475 LANC33 Truce/Lancaster
2019/02/07 20:26:55 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C BEE00.942-1.76 neighbor: Site BEE00.942-1.75; CC=0-1125 858.0375 BUCK33 800 Buckingham/Bucks?
2019/02/07 20:27:56 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C Lost control channel; tuning to 857.587500
2019/02/07 20:31:11 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C Current network: BEE00.942 PA-STARNet
2019/02/07 20:31:11 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C Current site: BEE00.942-1.76 CHES01 800 Morgantown/Chester
2019/02/07 20:31:12 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C 859.6375 43.6 m NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS OF THE MI BURCHARD SAWMILL RD .6 MI/CHESTERTOWN/QUEEN ANN 20K0F1D
2019/02/07 20:31:12 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C BEE00.942-1.76 neighbor: Site BEE00.942-1.69; CC=0-1217 858.6125 CHES96 800 Oxford/Chester FAILED, ISOLATED
2019/02/07 20:31:13 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C BEE00.942-1.76 neighbor: Site BEE00.942-1.68; CC=0-1221 858.6375 CHES31 800 Pocopson/Chester?
2019/02/07 20:31:14 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C BEE00.942-1.76 neighbor: Site BEE00.942-1.75; CC=0-1125 858.0375 BUCK33 800 Buckingham/Bucks?
2019/02/07 20:31:15 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C BEE00.942-1.76 neighbor: Site BEE00.942-1.65; CC=4-1379 153.4475 LANC33 Truce/Lancaster
2019/02/07 20:32:30 Freq=859.637500 NAC=94C BSI=WRAL397 Ch=856.5875
2019/02/07 20:35:51 Freq=153.522500 NAC=94C 153.5225 19.8 m AIR METHODS 5MO IG Mobile COATESVILLE, PA (CHESTER) WQUV971 FMN
You're developing a complex. Your note was attached last night to the submission that I held previously. That was the submission with all the PSP talkgroups labelled. I think we've explained already why we have no plans to put those talkgroups in the database for now. It is not that the material is patently false. The database admin handbook specifically states: " Frequencies and talkgroups must have a confirmed description (i.e., they must be identified) to be included in the database. Include unidentified or unconfirmed data in the relevant portion of the RR wiki instead. "
I gotta tell ya, you're out of line here. Against my better judgment, I sent you a private message, hoping we can bring this down a few notches...but that was before this latest post you made.Thanks for the favor, the new definition of insane can be found two posts above. Maybe someone who's not getting influence from the commonwealth can take over the PA STARNet RR DB Admin job.. DONE!
Thank You for the report!T2 Gibsonia (Allegheny) TG 10197
I am not certain this is correct. I'm not getting any hits on this and I think I should be according to the template.