Phx DTRS verified talkgroups list

Status
Not open for further replies.

AZScanner

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
3,342
Reaction score
13
Location
Somewhere in this room. Right now, you're very col
Well, I've been scanning away on this thing for a couple weeks now and so far here's the big list o' talkgroups I've found and identified. (This list does not include the encrypted stuff since there's no point in programming them in anyway.)
Phoenix PD:
PHX PD A4-02996
PHX PD B4-02980
PHX PD A5-02995
PHX PD B5-02979
PHX PD A6-02994
PHX PD B6-02978
PHX PD A7-02993
PHX PD B7-02977
PHX PD A8-02992
PHX PD B8-02976
PHX PD A9-02991
PHX PD B9-02975
All others are encrypted, including all C-deck channels and legacy channels 10,11 and 12(info). Bah! Humbug! :evil:

Mesa PD and Fire/Gilbert PD
GILBERT [1]-03049
GILBERT [2]-03050
GILBERT [3]-03051
GILBERT [6]-03054
MESA DIST 1-03000
MESA DIST 2-03003
MESA DIST 3-03006
MESA DIST 4-03009
MESA INFO*-03016
MESA SWAT*-03033
MESA FD [1]-03064
MESA FD [2]-03065
MESA FD [3]-03066

All the other good stuff is encrypted here too. The tgid's marked with an * indicate that these may now be encrypted, but they were in the clear when I monitored them.

That's it so far. I also heard traffic on 201 and 203 - not sure what they were, sounded like radio techs. Who knows. I'm also waiting eagerly for Phoenix Fire to start simulcasting on this thing - if anyone has or gets any TGID info for PFD please post, thanks!

Happy Scanning Arizona!
-AZ
 

precoislen

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2003
Messages
249
Reaction score
0
Location
Houston, TX
Keep us updated. Kinda sad that I am no longer living in Phoenix. PFD must be one of the most awesome fire departments in the world and the new TRS will make listening to them even better.

AZ Scanner... I am jealous :lol:
 

AZScanner

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
3,342
Reaction score
13
Location
Somewhere in this room. Right now, you're very col
Update: It would appear that at least ONE of the problems the users of this system are reporting is directly related to the simulcasting on the old VHF channels.

For example:

A PD officer is issued a digital HT and is assigned to a vehicle with an analog radio. If the analog radio and digital HT are tuned to the same "channel" then when the officer radios out on the analog radio, his voice will be simulcasted over the digital system with about a 1/4 to 1/2 second delay. This causes an echo effect to occur, which is in turn, picked up by the mic on the analog radio and the whole cycle repeats. In addition, the echo will get louder and louder each time until the officer is totally unintelligible (usually within 20 seconds or less).

So what is perceived to be a "problem with the new system" is simply nothing more than an officer training issue (turn down the HT when in the car). Once the transition is complete and simulcating is no longer needed, this "problem" will automatically be eliminated.

I'd be interested in hearing the other complaints users are reporting, if anyone knows them. I'd like to know just how good or bad they feel the new system is. There were comments posted in this forum a couple months back that hinted at this, but no specifics were given.

I'll be sure to post any TG updates here as warranted. I haven't had much time to monitor this week, but so far nothing new.

-AZ
 

hulka

Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2004
Messages
446
Reaction score
39
Location
Laveen, Az
The delay is just the way the digital stuff works. If you are talking on a channel and have someone about 5' from you you will here your self come over about 1 -2 second later on total digital. It is funny listening to someone talking and hearing themselves. They will start to stutter. It takes a little getting used to. A digital radio on and analog system is not as bad but there is still a delay.
 

littleman12

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2004
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
AZScanner said:
Well, I've been scanning away on this thing for a couple weeks now and so far here's the big list o' talkgroups I've found and identified. (This list does not include the encrypted stuff since there's no point in programming them in anyway.)
Phoenix PD:
PHX PD A4-02996
PHX PD B4-02980
PHX PD A5-02995
PHX PD B5-02979
PHX PD A6-02994
PHX PD B6-02978
PHX PD A7-02993
PHX PD B7-02977
PHX PD A8-02992
PHX PD B8-02976
PHX PD A9-02991
PHX PD B9-02975
All others are encrypted, including all C-deck channels and legacy channels 10,11 and 12(info). Bah! Humbug!


I am going to buy the Pro-96 scanner and was wondering the numbers you just posted do I just press those numbers into the scanner like they are?

Thanks

Chris
 

ShawnCowden

Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2003
Messages
843
Reaction score
1
Location
London, Kentucky
PHX PD is suppose to bring hot channels back to B deck in clear digital mode and leave C deck encrypted??

any info on this will be good also..
 

DanRollman

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
603
Location
Atlanta, GA
ShawnCowden said:
PHX PD is suppose to bring hot channels back to B deck in clear digital mode and leave C deck encrypted??

any info on this will be good also..

Don't know for sure how they will do it, whether moving Hot to B (which is already UNencrypted), or whether they will somehow make C-Deck UNencrypted.

However they decide to do it, the PIO has said Hot traffic will be "in the clear" by the time the unencrypted VHF patches are taken down.

Dan
www.ArizonaScanner.com
 

E5911

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
647
Reaction score
82
Location
the lower desert
WEST COUNTY FIRE AGENCIES

How far west will the dtrs system cover at buildout?
Do buckeye and the other west county fire agencies intend to migrate or stay on vhf. I ask because I see no site for White tanks.
 

DanRollman

Member
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
1,274
Reaction score
603
Location
Atlanta, GA
Re: WEST COUNTY FIRE AGENCIES

E5911 said:
How far west will the dtrs system cover at buildout?
Do buckeye and the other west county fire agencies intend to migrate or stay on vhf. I ask because I see no site for White tanks.

No clue. Fire is still a long way off. There is an ongoing discussion on the ArizonaScanner list at Yahoo!Groups of fire's dissatisfaction with the new system, so much so that they are apparently revising their plans. Unknown what will come of it.

Outside Phoenix, each fire agency pays its own way. If Buckeye wants to move to 800 (or wherever Phoenix moves), they have to pony up for an extension of the system, from what we've heard (although they could just add a couple of simple 800 conventional repeaters, as Daisy Mountain plans/planned to do).

Dan
www.ArizonaScanner.com
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top