I would NOT do what is suggested above because you are likely to overcharge the batteries and have them explode inside the scanner. Even if you put a switch in, you may forget and the batteries would run hot and explode. How do I know? I did it when I was a kid :lol: although they did not get to the point of meltdown. (and BTW - If you did do this the batteries would act as a voltage regulator, so a regulated supply is not needed.)
A safer way to do it is to have a drop resister off of the power supply to "regulate" the current of the battery charge. You would have to experiment a little with an amp meter to see what value works best, and you will need a higher wattage resistor to handle the higher current during peak charge conditions. What will happen when you have the right value is the charge will start out fast and eventually end up trickling ideally at 10 ~ 20 mA. It may take some time to charge though. Then you need a diode to feed the scanner (this blocks full current charging but allows feeding the scanner). It could be done if you know what you are doing. Also, if the batteries are not in good working condition, the charge current may become less optimal, but they would need replacement anyway.
I was wondering if you could make it charge like a PRO106 using GRE's internal method. I doubt the contacts are provided being a different circuit board, and I bet there is a shunt for the logic to disable this feature anyway. You would need a schematic to back engineer it.
Phil
