programing software pro 197

Status
Not open for further replies.

elishaman

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
4
Location
petersburg,KY
I am looking for suggestions for software to program my rs pro 197. I watched a video for scancat lite and it looks very user friendly especially if you buy the combo cd with the frequencies on it. I have read on this forum that a lot of people use win 500 but it look intimidating to me. I am looking for police/ fire in Boone, Kenton, Campbell counties in KY. I received an analog scanner for Christmas and took it back to rs and got the pro 197 because I know our county is about to go digital. I greatly appreciate any help.
 

joetnymedic

Member
Feed Provider
Joined
May 30, 2003
Messages
761
Location
West Haven, CT
i use win 500 and it was well worth the money for me. I use win 97 too. ARC is ok also, it just depends on what you like. I prefer Don S's software some people prefer arc. Sort of like Fords and Chevys although I love my Chevy but I love Fords too-lol
 

krokus

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
6,187
Location
Southeastern Michigan
I have been pretty happy with PSREdit, but YMMV. Check the trial versions out, and see which is best for your taste, as others have mentioned.

Having one of the software packages makes things nice, and you also have a backup of your programming, should you get another radio.
 

elishaman

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
4
Location
petersburg,KY
What is the big problem with scancat lite? I see from reading through this forum that everyone recommends win 500 or arc 500 but after reading the home page for each, I am not sure I could use the programs. I just want something that will make it easy to program basic fire, police, etc into my pro 197. I saw the "friends don't let friends use scancat lite" quote so it is evident that there is a problem with it. Thanks for your patience with me as I am just getting started with using a scanner.
 

bama9999

Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2006
Messages
741
Location
Gulf Coast
I've never used Scancat lite, so I have no comment about it. However, do yourself a favor and at least give PSREdit500 a try. I use it, and find it to be very user-friendly and Mike, the author, has good tech-support should you happen to need it.
 

krokus

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2006
Messages
6,187
Location
Southeastern Michigan
Mike is a regular on these forums, as is Don, who wrote Win500. I believe one of the people with Butel is on here, who is behind ARC series of programs.

I like PSREdit, but just want to be fair. :)

Like I said, elishaman, they all offer a trial period. Give them all a try, and see which you like best. It will make programming your scanner a much easier affair.
 

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
25,747
Location
Bowie, Md.
Unfortunately Scancrap has a very poor reputation with its software development insofar as their Lite Plus product is concerned. There have been MANY reports of folks' scanners getting seriously messed up when using it; and as I understand it, RS stores are moving away from using it (they used to use it to pre-program scanners for people when they bought them - only to very often screw them up too).

I did a review on this software years ago when it had just come out - I believe (this is simply my opinion) that the software is being 'pushed' without proper research and testing. You cannot expect to be able to support every scanner that this software supposedly does without at least testing it on an actual unit. In most cases, I doubt that this is being done. I suggested to the author that he form a beta group with users of each scanner in order to fully test it before release, and you can guess where that suggestion ended up.

To be fair, at least some of the issues come from users who simply don't understand what they are doing. But well-designed software should account for this, at least as much as is possible. The code for the grids and design was developed by a third party, for which the author had to pay a licensing fee, with evidently little knowledge of how it worked, at least in the beginning. I suspect he dug into it for later versions, but that only hurts the development and testing cycle even more. I know from experience how that cycle can end badly.

Another shortcoming was being married to what is nothing more than a fancy FCC data dump, instead of using RR for its data source. In point of fact, they did have a version (briefly) that had a copy/paste ability to grab data from RR, but it's no longer mentioned on their website.

In short, it could have been far more than it is. It had the potential - it was wasted in the rush.

best regards..Mike
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top