What do you prefer and why.........RT systems or Butel software for programming your R30 ??
Thanks
Bob
N2OAM
I'll second Hit_Factor's reply. All in all, I probably use Icom's software more than any however. It is thorough but does lack some features RT's does better like bulk editing.
Like RT's software for the Icom R8600, some radio configuration items are still missing. Many are non-essential but when you realize certain things cannot be done with RT's software, it can be disappointing as you must change things in the radio or end up using Icom's software.
I find myself using Icom's software by default more than any other. If I'm going to make a lot of changes to an entire group or a large percentage of a group, then I'll use RT's software and then read the radio back into Icom's software and change those radio specific settings that can't be changed by RT's or Butel's packages.
I find myself doing the exact same with my R8600 and its available software minus Butel as I don't think they ever released anything for the R8600.
Butel's method of backing up your R30's configuration settings and working with that config file is just strange as well. It's slow and cumbersome to say the least. Why Butel chose that method is beyond me unless there was no direct access to the R30's settings when Gommert first started developing software for the R30. Butel's software may be okay if they re-wrote it to work directly like Icom and RT_Systems do but that would likely mean scrapping ARC-30 and starting over. I doubt Gommert likes the thought of that.