BenFranske
Member
- Joined
- May 6, 2005
- Messages
- 37
I've recently upgraded from a Pro-2096 to a PSR-600 for my main scanner and I'm interested in having a discussion here with other PSR-500/600 users about programming organization specifically as it relates to large, multi-site P25 systems. I did post something about this in the Minnesota forum, but there are very few other PSR-500/600 users so far in Minnesota so we're all sort of stumbling in the dark. Hopefully someone from another part of the country has some insight on this.
In Minnesota we have a statewide P25 digital trunking system which is comprised of several sub-systems some of which overlap geographically. In one example a state trooper from one part of the state may drive to another part of the state and pull their talkgroup with them meaning that in theory almost any of the talkgroups could be heard on any of the systems though there are some exceptions where certain users are not allowed to affiliate with certain sub-systems.
The tricky part about this is in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area which is covered by multiple sub-systems (Minneapolis, St. Paul, Hennepin County East, Ramsey County and MN State Metro Area). Users on these sub-systems frequently affiliate with a system other than their home system (for example a state patrol officer driving in Minneapolis could be on the Minneapolis, Hennepin County East or MN State Metro Area system) and would pull their talkgroup with them.
Thus, my question is should I treat the entire statewide system as one large system (eg. one TSYS object with lots of control channel frequencies) or divide it into sub-systems (separate TSYS objects for Hennepin East, Minneapolis, Ramsey, State, etc.)? What are the advantages and disadvantages?
For the time being I'm treating it as one large system but obviously I can't put all the control channels in (just the ones I'm most likely to hear from my location).
Also, any thoughts so far on MultiSiteMode (Off/Roam/Stationary)? I'm assuming this also might be impacted by whether you treat it as one system or as several.
I can see advantages in treating it as a single system (when units roam onto another system and pull the talkgroup you won't miss them if you have a stronger signal from that system, no need to duplicate interop talkgroups, possibly faster scanning).
On the other hand I can see advantages in treating it as multiple systems because I think if you treat it as one system depending on the MultiSiteMode you could potentially lock on to a single control channel (eg. the Minneapolis system) and miss traffic on another system (like HennepinE).
In Minnesota we have a statewide P25 digital trunking system which is comprised of several sub-systems some of which overlap geographically. In one example a state trooper from one part of the state may drive to another part of the state and pull their talkgroup with them meaning that in theory almost any of the talkgroups could be heard on any of the systems though there are some exceptions where certain users are not allowed to affiliate with certain sub-systems.
The tricky part about this is in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area which is covered by multiple sub-systems (Minneapolis, St. Paul, Hennepin County East, Ramsey County and MN State Metro Area). Users on these sub-systems frequently affiliate with a system other than their home system (for example a state patrol officer driving in Minneapolis could be on the Minneapolis, Hennepin County East or MN State Metro Area system) and would pull their talkgroup with them.
Thus, my question is should I treat the entire statewide system as one large system (eg. one TSYS object with lots of control channel frequencies) or divide it into sub-systems (separate TSYS objects for Hennepin East, Minneapolis, Ramsey, State, etc.)? What are the advantages and disadvantages?
For the time being I'm treating it as one large system but obviously I can't put all the control channels in (just the ones I'm most likely to hear from my location).
Also, any thoughts so far on MultiSiteMode (Off/Roam/Stationary)? I'm assuming this also might be impacted by whether you treat it as one system or as several.
I can see advantages in treating it as a single system (when units roam onto another system and pull the talkgroup you won't miss them if you have a stronger signal from that system, no need to duplicate interop talkgroups, possibly faster scanning).
On the other hand I can see advantages in treating it as multiple systems because I think if you treat it as one system depending on the MultiSiteMode you could potentially lock on to a single control channel (eg. the Minneapolis system) and miss traffic on another system (like HennepinE).