PSR-500 Failure to Track P-25 Systems Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

w8jjr

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
239
Location
Lincoln MI
detroit780 said:
Judging from the features, ease of operation, and reaction time to upgrades I'd say they are bigger Radio Geeks than the people in here. That's a good thing!

I found most of my no decode issue. It's an EMC problem. Figures an EMC guy suffers from his own issues. There is a table to the right of my chair in the family room. When I leave the 500 there and my laptop is in my lap the radio will hang on TG's and the audio will get choppy in and out the LED will flash on and off as it receives and loses the signal. If I grab the radio it mellows out and either scans or produces chop free audio. So now I leave it on the other side of the laptop and it's fine.

I guess if I find other cases of this I'll finally open the radio up and see if any of my little RF band aids can be used safely.

Now with the latest upgrades this radio just sings. I can't wait to get my PSR-600 now!

Les,

I found the same thing as you. Coffee table with laptop in middle. Placing the radio to the right and It gets choppy . To left and its much better. I too was thinking what a coat of rf reflect paint inside the case would do. It has helped with other radios.

On another note I can decode Detroit 99% of the time and its a joy to listen to DFD again.
Also get Downriver, St Clair County, and Wayne West most of the time. I am in Rochester Hills. So the radio is a rocking for me
 

proquist96

Member
Joined
May 15, 2006
Messages
149
Location
Costa Mesa, Ca
I'm sure i will get a PSR-500 someday,with any luck they will come out with a seccond generation that has a dark face, improved/and or more features. I know they will keep getting better.
 

kikito

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2,603
Location
North Pole, Alaska
proquist96 said:
I'm sure i will get a PSR-500 someday,with any luck they will come out with a seccond generation that has a dark face, improved/and or more features. I know they will keep getting better.

You might be waiting a long time....

And by then the next generation will come out with an even lighter face plate....
 

detroit780

Silent Key
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
589
Location
Michigan
Color Vs. Performance

Many people loved the Ford Model T. Those who waited for a color other than black waited a long time. Those that bought one loved it. Those that waited continued to walk or ride a horse.

Think of all the fun you're missing discovering how awesome this radio is. The performance outweighs the color as far as I 'm concerend after all it's a scanner not artwork hanging on the wall.


kikito said:
You might be waiting a long time....

And by then the next generation will come out with an even lighter face plate....
 

RodStrong

Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2007
Messages
1,173
Location
West
"Many people loved the Ford Model T. Those who waited for a color other than black waited a long time. Those that bought one loved it. Those that waited continued to walk or ride a horse."

No doubt this is a great scanner. I got mine a few days ago, and it works flawlessly on my local 800mhz digital trunked system. I play with radios for a living, and have been playing with scanners all my life. This is a kickass scanner. I am so glad I didn't have the "I'll wait around a while until they get the bugs out and the RR threads show the scanner has no problems". I just nutted up and bought one, and it's by far the best scanner I've ever known. Perhaps I just got a lucky model with no hangups, but I am happy as a pig in sh*t.
 

njscanmaster

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
86
Location
Ridgefield NJ
Can someone help me

I need to put in Jacksom NJ Sys in my PSR-500

Here is the Info : Custom Frequency Table

1 2
Base: 500.0000 507.0000
Spacing: 12.5 12.5
Offset: 380 660

Do I need the Hi & Lo Ch in it

Next is Manchester NJ

Here is the Info : Custom Frequency Table:

Base: 450.00000
Offset: 8192
Step: 12.5

Next is Burlington, NJ

Here is the Info : Custom Frequency Table

1 2 3
Base: 500.3250 502.4250 506.4750
Spacing: 12.5 12.5 12.5
Offset: 380 530 559

Or do I use this setup here

Ch LO 380 - Ch Hi 529 - Base 500.3250 - Offset 380 - Step 12.5
Ch lo 530 - Ch Hi 558 - Base 502.4250 - Offset 530 - Step 12.5
Ch Lo 559 - Ch Hi 759 - Base 506.4750 - Offset 559 - Step 12.5


Plz Write Back !!! Thank Jerry
 

fmon

Silent Key Jan. 14, 2012
Joined
May 11, 2002
Messages
7,741
Location
Eclipse, Virginia
Jackson
Code:
	ChLo	ChHi	Offset	Base 	        Step
Table 1	380	659	380	500.0000	12.5
Table 2	660	759	660	507.0000	12.5
Manchester
Code:
Table 1	8192	12287	8192	450.0000	12.5
Burlington is correct.
 

njscanmaster

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
86
Location
Ridgefield NJ
fmon said:
Jackson
Code:
	ChLo	ChHi	Offset	Base 	        Step
Table 1	380	659	380	500.0000	12.5
Table 2	660	759	660	507.0000	12.5
Manchester
Code:
Table 1	8192	12287	8192	450.0000	12.5
Burlington is correct.

Thanks alot
 

Statevillian

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
255
Location
Chicago, IL.
The latest CPU and DSP upgrades..... as well as the beta releases of the same (0.2 and 0.3) have been fantastic for the Illinois Starcom P25 system. Without that upgrade I'd still be wondering what was being said when those comms were dropping out. I've tested Chicago areas as far north as Niles. IL. and as far south as 55th & the lake shore drive and as far west as Aurora and southwest as Joliet. I have also driven through forested areas and every majot highway and tollway in the Chicagoland area. Side by side with Uniden 396 and each did very well. All areas with muti-site stat tracking have been great. Good improvements. Thanks GRE!
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
150
Location
Southern Illinois
Statevillian said:
The latest CPU and DSP upgrades..... as well as the beta releases of the same (0.2 and 0.3) have been fantastic for the Illinois Starcom P25 system. Without that upgrade I'd still be wondering what was being said when those comms were dropping out. I've tested Chicago areas as far north as Niles. IL. and as far south as 55th & the lake shore drive and as far west as Aurora and southwest as Joliet. I have also driven through forested areas and every majot highway and tollway in the Chicagoland area. Side by side with Uniden 396 and each did very well. All areas with muti-site stat tracking have been great. Good improvements. Thanks GRE!


I don't mean this in any bad way --- but come down south of I-64 and try starcom..

whole different animal here with a HH. (yea I was in Chicagoland for 3 days w/ my 396t in mid-october and very different than here).
 

Statevillian

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
255
Location
Chicago, IL.
No offense taken...but lots of questions

DamnDirtyApe said:
I don't mean this in any bad way --- but come down south of I-64 and try starcom..

whole different animal here with a HH. (yea I was in Chicagoland for 3 days w/ my 396t in mid-october and very different than here).


Do you have a GRE500?..... I am only going to assume so since this is a thread for the GRE500. If this is related to only the 396 and has nothing to do with the firmware upgrade or failure to track P25 reception issue then you should probably be consulting the Uniden threads and let UPMan know.
I was only prefacing the Chicago area since that is the area my job, home and family take me to. I am only expressing my appreciation for my designated area. If you have a 500 and your reception is poor in your area, express it to GRE....that the latest version still isn't good enough. They won't know if the latest upgrade is working or not unless we, the consumer, say so. So, I feel in my roughly 2 to 3 weeks of a lot of travel the issue here is resolved. It took the upgrade to get my 500 tracking properly on both 700 and 800Mhz sites. I also played with various expert settings to optimize my overall performance.

I sympothize with your frustration. These 700Mhz sites and simulcast sites had me very frustrated with the GRE500 when i first got mine. But, I can't say I ever had a bad experience in the Chicago area with the 396. I did have some poor reception in some areas of downtown with the 396 in a couple areas where I was between skyscrapers and below street level while monitoring Starcom. I have heard the GRE people read this and my message was directed at the people who own one in this area and may not have decided to try the upgrade and to GRE reps directly. If you have a 500 then I guess we all now know that south of I 64 the P25 Starcom system is either out of phase, lacks additional towers for site coverage or some other 'system' issue that the upgrade hasn't corrected. Try the carmachicago yahoo group and post that issue there. Many members do travel all over and maybe one of them can help you make sense of the issue you are having where you are at. They have been very helpful with local issues and info. Hope it gets better!
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
150
Location
Southern Illinois
Statevillian said:
Do you have a GRE500?..... I am only going to assume so since this is a thread for the GRE500. If this is related to only the 396 and has nothing to do with the firmware upgrade or failure to track P25 reception issue then you should probably be consulting the Uniden threads and let UPMan know.
I was only prefacing the Chicago area since that is the area my job, home and family take me to. I am only expressing my appreciation for my designated area. If you have a 500 and your reception is poor in your area, express it to GRE....that the latest version still isn't good enough. They won't know if the latest upgrade is working or not unless we, the consumer, say so. So, I feel in my roughly 2 to 3 weeks of a lot of travel the issue here is resolved. It took the upgrade to get my 500 tracking properly on both 700 and 800Mhz sites. I also played with various expert settings to optimize my overall performance.

I sympothize with your frustration. These 700Mhz sites and simulcast sites had me very frustrated with the GRE500 when i first got mine. But, I can't say I ever had a bad experience in the Chicago area with the 396. I did have some poor reception in some areas of downtown with the 396 in a couple areas where I was between skyscrapers and below street level while monitoring Starcom. I have heard the GRE people read this and my message was directed at the people who own one in this area and may not have decided to try the upgrade and to GRE reps directly. If you have a 500 then I guess we all now know that south of I 64 the P25 Starcom system is either out of phase, lacks additional towers for site coverage or some other 'system' issue that the upgrade hasn't corrected. Try the carmachicago yahoo group and post that issue there. Many members do travel all over and maybe one of them can help you make sense of the issue you are having where you are at. They have been very helpful with local issues and info. Hope it gets better!

Yes I do. Main problem in this area is the lack of towers, heard from a relative over the weekend that is now an "I" officer with ISP (D-chgo), recently transferred from this area into it. He said it was like night and day going from this area down here to upstate communications-wise. He really liked playing with both the 396 and 500, had never seen a p25 *scanner*.
 

Statevillian

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
255
Location
Chicago, IL.
Man, that stinks. There was some problem with the simul sites up here. Better now. Site 113 in Will County was giving one user (Plainfield) fits for a while. I use the stock antenna on the 500 and have the G on the display. Huge difference from not having it on and using the Radio Shack 800 antenna. Tracked much smoother. Doesn't sound like any kinda upgrade is gonna help. Only more towers or them turning up the juice. I have felt your pain.
 

DaveIN

Founders Curmudgen
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
6,515
Location
West Michigan
Just a reminder Bobby. Having the "G" on the display only means global. You need the "A" for attenuator, along with the "G" if you want "global" attenuation. You can turn the attenuator on via the keypad or in the global settings.
 

Statevillian

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
255
Location
Chicago, IL.
Global helps!

DaveIN said:
Just a reminder Bobby. Having the "G" on the display only means global. You need the "A" for attenuator, along with the "G" if you want "global" attenuation. You can turn the attenuator on via the keypad or in the global settings.

Hi Dave! Yes, I only need gloabal to keep the BEAST in line. If I hit A I end up minimizing my control channel power.....not worth that.
 
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
150
Location
Southern Illinois
Statevillian said:
Man, that stinks. There was some problem with the simul sites up here. Better now. Site 113 in Will County was giving one user (Plainfield) fits for a while. I use the stock antenna on the 500 and have the G on the display. Huge difference from not having it on and using the Radio Shack 800 antenna. Tracked much smoother. Doesn't sound like any kinda upgrade is gonna help. Only more towers or them turning up the juice. I have felt your pain.

So you find the stock duckie and G is better than the RS 800 without then I take it?
 

Statevillian

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
255
Location
Chicago, IL.
May be subjective.......

DamnDirtyApe said:
So you find the stock duckie and G is better than the RS 800 without then I take it?

For where I am it works best....and I have experimented with just about every setting and combo since I got the 500. The front end is powerful and the RS800 is too. It just makes my trunking go haywire and I get tons of intermod. Especially on 867.xxxx freqs.
 

RoninJoliet

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
3,402
Location
ILL
Bobby, as Dave said having the "G" on is just the beginning of turning on the "Global", the "A" is what does the attenuation...So its the same receive with the "G" on or NO "G", its the "A" that matters....Have a good day Bobby!!
 

Statevillian

Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2006
Messages
255
Location
Chicago, IL.
Thanks Bro!

RoninJoliet said:
Bobby, as Dave said having the "G" on is just the beginning of turning on the "Global", the "A" is what does the attenuation...So its the same receive with the "G" on or NO "G", its the "A" that matters....Have a good day Bobby!!


Gotcha. I meant the global Att.
 

Russell

Texas DB Admin
Database Admin
Joined
Dec 18, 2002
Messages
1,802
Location
Dallas Texas
Austin Update.

While the latest firmware upgrades are a significant help to the Austin P25 system, there are still multiple locations in Austin where the radio begins flipping from VC to DG, audio dropping out, etc. The problem is I can't tell if it's being overdriven or if the signal is too low. I just term them as 'bad' signal areas. Unfortunately, one is my Austin apartment. While using the ducky and an external antenna shows no improvement, removing the the antenna completely makes the signal go away completely and attenuate tends to make it worse.

What is really throwing me is that the external antenna vs the ducky makes no difference. This tends to make me believe the radio is being overdriven by either the frequency I am listening to or some other signal as there are other towers within a mile of that 'bad' location.

Moving the radio to different locs within the (ground floor) apartment makes a big difference, as well, with a wide variance between good copy to no decode at all. I would be interested in hearing other experiences of the PSR500 and the Austin system.

Russell
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top