• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Quantar or Tait TB9100 for P25C?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Cameron314

Member
Joined
May 30, 2003
Messages
255
IP link? We used to have some point to point radios that used a pair of RG-6 like that. Would sometimes find the same thing. I offered to make custom cables for them, but they weren't interested. Their attitude was "if it works, it works".
The old Cisco Aironet (or whatever) used two coax cables but those have been gone for years. Likely just two shielded outdoor Cat5/6 cables. No real loss with some extra.
 

BMDaug

I am licensed…
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2022
Messages
1,134
Location
Central Colorado, USA
Are you seeing a trucked site with combiner and receiver multicoupler antennas by chance?
They are trunked sites mostly. I know they use two folded dipole arrays, one for RX and one for TX. One of the administrators that helped build the network has breakfast with the ham club every week. It’s just the distance between antennas on the tower I’m not positive about. It’s hard to judge distance and scale on a tower for me sometimes. I’ll ask him about the antenna setup next meeting.

-B
 

Cameron314

Member
Joined
May 30, 2003
Messages
255
They are trunked sites mostly. I know they use two folded dipole arrays, one for RX and one for TX. One of the administrators that helped build the network has breakfast with the ham club every week. It’s just the distance between antennas on the tower I’m not positive about. It’s hard to judge distance and scale on a tower for me sometimes. I’ll ask him about the antenna setup next meeting.

-B

So those aren't just two antennas with one going directly into the RX port and one going to the TX port of a repeater like it sounds like you are wanting to do. You just need to get a duplexer if you only have a single repeater.
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
24,349
Location
I am a lineman for the county.
The old Cisco Aironet (or whatever) used two coax cables but those have been gone for years. Likely just two shielded outdoor Cat5/6 cables. No real loss with some extra.

No, these were RG-6. I grabbed the reel of cable when they were going to throw it out. I used it to move a satellite internet dish at one of our remote sites. It was many years ago, however. I -do- know the difference between twisted pair and coaxial cable at this point in my career.
 

BMDaug

I am licensed…
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2022
Messages
1,134
Location
Central Colorado, USA
So those aren't just two antennas with one going directly into the RX port and one going to the TX port of a repeater like it sounds like you are wanting to do. You just need to get a duplexer if you only have a single repeater.
Thanks! Ya I realize there are multicouplers and combiners involved. They have usually around six stations sharing an antenna and they use tower top amps on all the receive antennas. I’m sure it gives them better control of the entire system to separate RX and TX antennas like that.

I’m looking at a Telewave ANT150D for the antenna along with a duplexer. Then an intermod panel… so still a couple of grand from a completed system…

-B
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
24,349
Location
I am a lineman for the county.
Thanks! Ya I realize there are multicouplers and combiners involved. They have usually around six stations sharing an antenna and they use tower top amps on all the receive antennas. I’m sure it gives them better control of the entire system to separate RX and TX antennas like that.


Is this an 700 or 800MHz trunked system?
 

BMDaug

I am licensed…
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2022
Messages
1,134
Location
Central Colorado, USA
Is this an 700 or 800MHz trunked system?
Yes, seems to be both. I think that’s part of why it works so well. You’ve got 30MHz or 45MHz between RX and TX and they still filter. There’s usually 60dB or better separation.

Edit: The band plan is around 82X.XXXX -45 and 77X.XXXX +30

-B
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
24,349
Location
I am a lineman for the county.
There's your answer. The transmit combiners/receive multicouplers have some filtering, plus, as you noted, the 45MHz offset.

Won't work on VHF, just not enough separation. A duplexer and use the full antenna is the way to go.
 

BMDaug

I am licensed…
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2022
Messages
1,134
Location
Central Colorado, USA
There's your answer. The transmit combiners/receive multicouplers have some filtering, plus, as you noted, the 45MHz offset.

Won't work on VHF, just not enough separation. A duplexer and use the full antenna is the way to go.
Thanks again for your help! That’s what I’m gonna do… Please just to help me understand though… the state uses 30MHz and 45MHz offsets in the ~800MHz band. Isn’t this pretty close to the same actual spacing (using a unit of measure like centimeters) as 7MHz in the VHF band? My frequencies are ~152MHz and ~159MHz. I’m not sure what words to use to properly convey what I mean. Ya, you’re talking about 30-45MHz, but that’s with little tiny 800MHz wavelengths… I’m at 7MHz offset with much like longer wavelengths. Does RF not work this way?

I’m not trying to argue with you, here. I’m going to take your build advice for sure, I’m just trying to learn.

Thanks,
Brian
 

mmckenna

I ♥ Ø
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
24,349
Location
I am a lineman for the county.
Thanks again for your help! That’s what I’m gonna do… Please just to help me understand though… the state uses 30MHz and 45MHz offsets in the ~800MHz band. Isn’t this pretty close to the same actual spacing (using a unit of measure like centimeters) as 7MHz in the VHF band? My frequencies are ~152MHz and ~159MHz. I’m not sure what words to use to properly convey what I mean. Ya, you’re talking about 30-45MHz, but that’s with little tiny 800MHz wavelengths… I’m at 7MHz offset with much like longer wavelengths. Does RF not work this way?

I’m not trying to argue with you, here. I’m going to take your build advice for sure, I’m just trying to learn.

Thanks,
Brian

700MHz LMR band is 30MHz spacing
800MHz LMR band is 45MHz spacing.

You could run separate antennas on VHF, but you would need the filtering to keep the TX out of the RX. Since you are not using a trunked system with TX combiners with filtering and RX multicouplers with filtering, you still need to have some filtering. That's where you either need a lot of vertical separation or the duplexer.
The duplexer works much better than vertical separation since it keeps the TX and RX antenna in the same place so the coverage is the same. It also means you don't have to pay for two antennas and two feedlines on the tower. Some tower sites might charge you per antenna linear foot and for each run of coax up the tower. Usually duplexers are cheaper.

With 7MHz of separation, you shouldn't need super expensive duplexers.
 

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,682
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Your looking at a single dipole for a VHF repeater? That's 0dBd gain and would only be a good idea if the repeater is on a 6,000ft mountain and you need some coverage at the base. Most of the performance and range comes from the antenna not the repeater or other hardware.

Thanks! Ya I realize there are multicouplers and combiners involved. They have usually around six stations sharing an antenna and they use tower top amps on all the receive antennas. I’m sure it gives them better control of the entire system to separate RX and TX antennas like that.

I’m looking at a Telewave ANT150D for the antenna along with a duplexer. Then an intermod panel… so still a couple of grand from a completed system…

-B
 

Cameron314

Member
Joined
May 30, 2003
Messages
255
No, these were RG-6. I grabbed the reel of cable when they were going to throw it out. I used it to move a satellite internet dish at one of our remote sites. It was many years ago, however. I -do- know the difference between twisted pair and coaxial cable at this point in my career.
Well I was talking about Speedway's picture, didn't see notice yours I guess. If you had a pair of RG-6 it was likely the old Cisco's.
 

BMDaug

I am licensed…
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2022
Messages
1,134
Location
Central Colorado, USA
Your looking at a single dipole for a VHF repeater? That's 0dBd gain and would only be a good idea if the repeater is on a 6,000ft mountain and you need some coverage at the base. Most of the performance and range comes from the antenna not the repeater or other hardware.
Thabks… so, one of these is what I am looking at. All of the available sites are at around 9-10,000 feet and I do need coverage from the tower to the valley floor and up the other side of the valley. One of the sites is kinda at the ‘end’ of the valley where he river turns so in that case, I’d be shooting for a narrower and longer pattern. I’m definitely open to suggestions!!

-B
 

Attachments

  • TWDS-7045.pdf
    51 KB · Views: 13
Joined
Apr 30, 2008
Messages
1,337
Location
Pittsboro IN
because someone moved in and used rg58 for two 60’ runs in opposite directions to a couple of yagis that they just laid in some trees… Something about repeating a TV station?

Sounds like a passive repeater, use one on a UHF system to get coverage down a hall off the main floor of the Superdome.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top