I've never seen an adaptor to put a PL-259 on RG-174 cable. Most RG-174 that I've seen has been for shielded connections on a circuit board, not in a feed line. Except for very short runs RG-174 makes for terrible feed line.
RG174 are almost 4 times worse than RG58 below 10MHz but gets better the higher the frequency. Twice as bad as RG58 at 400MHz and only some 20% at 900Mhz. So try to use only as interconnection with short lenghts between devices.
RG-174 adapters for standard PL-259s are quite common, here is what they look like.
By definition and specs, RG-174 has a copper braid that solders easily. Same with its Teflon counterpart RG-316 but the copper braid and center conductor is silver plated. LMR100 is the same size as RG-174 and has a foil/braid shield but you can still solder to it.
The adapters shown below fit all types I just mentioned.
I've never seen an adaptor to put a PL-259 on RG-174 cable. Most RG-174 that I've seen has been for shielded connections on a circuit board, not in a feed line. Except for very short runs RG-174 makes for terrible feed line.
RG-174 looks to be about twice as lossy as RG-58 at all frequencies from below 1MHz past 1GHz. An example of twice as lossy is double the loss as in RG-58 has about 1.17dB loss at 10MHz for 100ft and RG-174 has about 2.5dB loss. At 1GHz RG-58 has about 16.4dB loss and RG-174 has about 33.6dB. I'm not seeing any major difference in loss at lower frequencies with RG-174 over RG-58.
RG174 are almost 4 times worse than RG58 below 10MHz but gets better the higher the frequency. Twice as bad as RG58 at 400MHz and only some 20% at 900Mhz. So try to use only as interconnection with short lenghts between devices.