• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

Radio Shack TRC-57 and Teaberry Stalker 2 Mirror images

Status
Not open for further replies.

tinkyr

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
22
Location
Orcutt CA
Hello all

About 7 years ago there was a thread on this site that I participated in about the Pearce Simpson Simba SSB/2. There is a lack of information about that radio, and people were asking questions. At the same time, I was interested in a restoration project and I picked that radio. I was feeling nostalgic and I wanted a radio that had the vibe of the 1970s but could be used as a modern 40 channel radio without ruining its stock looks. It is worth looking at What Was The Pearce Simpson Simba SSB/2?

Anyway, as a result of that youtube video, I got a lot of inquiries about doing the same for others, and also doing the same to other radios. I thought about it a while, and I decided I might try to make a universal board and then the type of radio to install it in would be selected with a DIP switch. When I did the original project, I had two runner ups, those were the Teaberry Stalker 2 and the Radio Shack TRC-57. I acquired the Sams Photofacts for both of them, and my memories were confirmed, that they were basically the same radio. They are schematically almost identical. I was used to this. Of course many different radios from different manufacturers use the same PCB. Then I noticed something odd. The boards are indeed similar, but they are almost MIRROR IMAGES of each other!

This seems astonishing to me. I am wondering if this was new to me and old knowledge. I have provided some pictures.

First, we have the radios side by sidePIC1.jpg


Then we have just the PCBs
side by side.jpg

So now, I have intentionally created a mirror image of the board on the right below. Look at the similarities.mirror.jpg
The board layouts are virtually identical when viewed as a mirror image. The only section that differs it the section outlined below in red. Even with the different layout, the schematics for that section are almost identical. Look at the location of the relay, the tunable inductors, the audio chip, the final and driver, the PLL Module, the big capacitors, the round ICs, the crystal filter, the rectangular notch in each board in the upper left corner. It is a mirror image!


redline.jpg

Has anybody ever noticed this before? Does anybody have a clue as to why somebody would go to the bother to do this?

By the way, I looked at the board for the Teaberry Stalker 1 mobile, and it has the same board as the Stalker 2. It is reminiscent of the same Uniden 858 boards in the 40 channel Stalker 202 base and the Stalker 101 mobile

Any theories?
 
Last edited:

trentbob

W3BUX- Bucks County, PA
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
6,084
Theories? A lot of stuff was rebranded then and they shared from Radio to radio. Old equipment LOL.;)
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,245
The tools used for board layouts back then were photographic. So it is possible the designer decided to flip it over and cut and paste for a new model.
 

tinkyr

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
22
Location
Orcutt CA
Theories? A lot of stuff was rebranded then and they shared from Radio to radio. Old equipment LOL.;)
I know there were PCBs that were installed in many different radios. For a while it seemed like every manufacturer had some version of the PLL02A PCB. Of course my favorite, the UPD858 chassis that was in the TRC-449 was in several radios by different manufacturers. The point here is that hsi was not the same board. It is a mirror image.
 

tinkyr

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
22
Location
Orcutt CA
The tools used for board layouts back then were photographic. So it is possible the designer decided to flip it over and cut and paste for a new model.
Well, this upside down theory makes the most sense so far, but things like the relay, the ICs, and all the metal transformer cans would not work upside down unless they installed them on the underside. I am not sure why they would think they needed to go to all the work of making a mirror image to have a new model. As has been mentioned, exact boards were used in different models, and continue to do so to this day. I wish we could set up an interview with a senior person at Undien and ask them a few questions. I would really like to know, for example, if they really got pressure from the FCC to stop manufacturing the 858 chassis, or if that is an urban legend.
 
Last edited:

trentbob

W3BUX- Bucks County, PA
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
6,084
You are stretching my brain way beyond capacity LOL the 449, 457 and 458 differ in small ways from other brands like Cobra, President, Robyn and Teaberry that used the 858 Uniden chassis.

There was slight differences in the wiring of the 449 that gave it terrible adjacent Channel rejection.

Kind of funny that I haven't thought about this as I would have no reason to in a long time and I smell an odd odor of wood burning in my brain LOL.
 

tramd

Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2021
Messages
23
The reason the TRC 449, the Cobra 138XLR and a few others that used those boards had poor rejection was that they lacked L6 and FT2. They used a jumper in place of those two parts. If the transformer and filter are installed they will be the same as the bases with much better side channel rejection.
 

tinkyr

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
22
Location
Orcutt CA
You are stretching my brain way beyond capacity LOL the 449, 457 and 458 differ in small ways from other brands like Cobra, President, Robyn and Teaberry that used the 858 Uniden chassis.

There was slight differences in the wiring of the 449 that gave it terrible adjacent Channel rejection.

Kind of funny that I haven't thought about this as I would have no reason to in a long time and I smell an odd odor of wood burning in my brain LOL.
Yeah, they do differ in some ways, but they all started out with the same PCB. Some got stuffed with different parts, or in the case of some Radio Shack versions whole inductors were bypassed allegedly to save on cost. The point is that they started with the same PCB. In this case, the boards are almost electrically identical, but mirror images. It just seem like a lot of work for no reason, and boards were a lot harder to layout back then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top