• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

RadioReference Database for Montgomery County Trunked System

Status
Not open for further replies.

jeffkraussws

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
117
I see the RadioReference database for the Montgomery County trunked system is using different talkgroup designations that what are actually used by the dispatchers. At today's Kemper golf tournament, the FD detail is using TG 12M but the database here calls it 75M. The bank of FD TGs that start with 8 (8C etc.) are referenced in the database as starting with 71 (71C etc.). I can understand that this would make all the FD talkgroups start with a 7, and the FD talkgroup plan would be consistent with adjacent jurisdictions. But that's not what I'm hearing. Is this planned for some future date?
 

jeffkraussws

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
117
Ah. Thanks for pointing that out.
I can reliably report that as of June 25 the new designations are not yet in effect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top