This is why people have stopped asking questions in the forum. As another member stated. A yes or no would of worked just fine.
Why ask questions if they are already answered? Apparently you had difficulty finding the thread - so I helped you out instead of letting your question sit unanswered (which based on the time interval, was the case here.) Stop whining and say "thanks" or just stay quiet next time.This is why people have stopped asking questions in the forum. As another member stated.
Don't believe it was every promoted as being able to monitor the DTRS, I mean you get what you pay for and when DTRS scanners are running close to $500 this holiday season why would one that's half that price have the same features?Gee wonder how many people would of went out and bought this, got it home just to realize it can't listen to the state system?
I've never thought the Pro-96 was a good aircraft scanner, some of the best aviation scanners are the older Pro-2006 and Pro-43 or at least that's what I have dedicated to aircraft monitoring. Don't forget the importance of an outdoor discone for the right freqs also Charles.Does this scanner do Aviation better then the Pro-96?
It's actually great for RRWell, Good for RR.
But doesn't a pile of cash appear as a result of success? I can't imagine it wouldn't....Sure revenue is nice for website operations however forgetting that subscriber and visitor participation and encouraging participation make the site. A pile of cash means nothing without it.
Image is everything in the net world.