EJB
20 + year membership
Hullo. I hope that this thread is in the right place. If not please move it to the correct place.
I'm a loyal Uniden man and I absolutely love tagging and naming the radio id's. I constantly am adding, subtracting, correcting, etc.
In 2010 I was very lucky to get a Home Patrol 1 and I immediately was able to tag literally up to close to 100's of thousands of RIDS,
The Home Patrol does a good job of decoding, there is also enough room to type in most of if not all the RIDS
For instance our provincial police force have so many RIDS to tag.. The decoding is almost perfect and seemless. My only complaint is that I make a bunch of errors and radios are taken out of cars, into new ones. So I have to put in brackets the Radio ID and there just is not enough space to put on everything.
So an example of what I type, our local provincial police detachment, Burlington 5 Charley gets entered in as such: Burlington 5C (666).
Ive been very blessed that I have the SDS100, A 396XT and a BCD 436. I was excited to have more room and both the 436 and SDS100 I don't have to type in the actual radio ID. I also hoped that the newer technology the scanners would do an even better job reading and decoding the comms.
Man I was disappointed with both the sds and the 436. The HP1 does a better job deciding. Very often the 436 and sds miss and when the dispatcher is talking the radio ID doesn't switch to the new radio, it often falls behind or misses it.
The 396XT does a good job with its limits, the PSR800 I had years ago did a decent job.
. But I am disappointed with this part of the sds and 436 scanners.
Perhaps some of you can give me your opinions and maybe share info and advice?
Eric
I'm a loyal Uniden man and I absolutely love tagging and naming the radio id's. I constantly am adding, subtracting, correcting, etc.
In 2010 I was very lucky to get a Home Patrol 1 and I immediately was able to tag literally up to close to 100's of thousands of RIDS,
The Home Patrol does a good job of decoding, there is also enough room to type in most of if not all the RIDS
For instance our provincial police force have so many RIDS to tag.. The decoding is almost perfect and seemless. My only complaint is that I make a bunch of errors and radios are taken out of cars, into new ones. So I have to put in brackets the Radio ID and there just is not enough space to put on everything.
So an example of what I type, our local provincial police detachment, Burlington 5 Charley gets entered in as such: Burlington 5C (666).
Ive been very blessed that I have the SDS100, A 396XT and a BCD 436. I was excited to have more room and both the 436 and SDS100 I don't have to type in the actual radio ID. I also hoped that the newer technology the scanners would do an even better job reading and decoding the comms.
Man I was disappointed with both the sds and the 436. The HP1 does a better job deciding. Very often the 436 and sds miss and when the dispatcher is talking the radio ID doesn't switch to the new radio, it often falls behind or misses it.
The 396XT does a good job with its limits, the PSR800 I had years ago did a decent job.
. But I am disappointed with this part of the sds and 436 scanners.
Perhaps some of you can give me your opinions and maybe share info and advice?
Eric