• Effective immediately we will be deleting, without notice, any negative threads or posts that deal with the use of encryption and streaming of scanner audio.

    We've noticed a huge increase in rants and negative posts that revolve around agencies going to encryption due to the broadcasting of scanner audio on the internet. It's now worn out and continues to be the same recycled rants. These rants hijack the threads and derail the conversation. They no longer have a place anywhere on this forum other than in the designated threads in the Rants forum in the Tavern.

    If you violate these guidelines your post will be deleted without notice and an infraction will be issued. We are not against discussion of this issue. You just need to do it in the right place. For example:
    https://forums.radioreference.com/rants/224104-official-thread-live-audio-feeds-scanners-wait-encryption.html

RDF of intermittent signals - a longer lasting fox?

Joined
Apr 9, 2018
Messages
238
Location
CO, USA
#1
Just wondering for those people who have been on foxhunts, how frequent should the pings be before it becomes "not worth the effort"?

If I were to build a "fox" that transmitted once a minute ... that in itself would be quite frustrating, but the battery would last much longer. On the other hand if it were transmitted a pulse every second, it'd be quite a bit easier but the battery would be dead in a day. What would be the best tradeoff for battery life and less frustration for the hunters?

Oh let me add one more stipulation: the "fox" will be stationary. Yeah, at 1 minute per pulse for a constantly moving target, that would be near impossible.
 
Top