Chris0516
Active Member
Where can I store them? When they are not in use or, being charged.
I bought the EBC100 from Uniden, for their BPS100. So, No mixing of 'brands'.Long term storage I like to deplete the charge to about half. They say that’s the way they transport the larger ones on airplanes so even if it’s not necessary with the little ones, it may save me from swelling. As I don’t recall any instruction as to where to store them, I would look for a cool dry place.
As to where to charge these batteries, it all depends upon the type of Lithium battery chemistry you use. I suspect you are referring to the portable scanner and portable amateur radio batteries. I charge my SDS100 batteries outside the radio in the optional charger that was packaged with the spare battery I purchased. (I even bought a second external charger for my truck.) when one battery is getting low I simply swap them out. After the battery has completed its charge I remove it from the charger. You can also charge the battery while it’s inside the radio, your choice.
When talking about these consumer batteries, there is always a post that relates to the “proper proceedure” or what passes as proper proceedure. I’m talking strictly about the L-I batteries we use in handheld devices such as the SDS100 and portable amateur radio gear. And while there is nothing wrong about posting proper procedure, it doesn’t amount to much unless there is a serious risk of injury or fire. I haven’t heard of any such risk… only some swelling of the SDS100 batteries (which are far and few between). So, human nature being what it is we become complacent. There’s no serious risks involved and the batteries are all understood to be disposable at some point in time so we just replace it when it goes bad.
So I wouldn’t worry about where you should store them when not in use or being charged… normal room temperature and dry.
Thanks@Chris0516 - Hey, you are over-thinking the situation. Enjoy your new scanner. Yes, there are a very very few folks who have experienced the swollen battery problem, but most haven't.
Regarding the battery, the most likely problem you will have is breaking the clip that holds the battery onto the scanner. Frequently releasing the clip to swap the battery out will speed up the process of breaking the clip. The best way to handle removing the battery is ->> Put pressure on the back center of the battery BEFORE you release the clip to remove the battery AND when putting another battery on the scanner, again put pressure on the back center of the battery before closing the clip.
I also understand UPS packed the batteries in the front of the aircraft, in close proximity to critical flight control equipment, under the flight deck (cockpit) or very close to it. The placing of the batteries wasn’t the cause of the fire but it did greatly shorten the amount of time the flight crew had to take alternative measures… such as ditching at sea if they couldn’t get to a land base. The Smithsonian cable TV channel has a show called “Air Disasters”. One of the episodes was an in-depth study that dealt with the UPS flight you refer to.This: Crash investigators trace UPS plane fire to batteries
-is why I asked. The root cause of the UPS plane crash was due to Li-Ion being tightly packed. Which caused a fire. Granted I don't have anywhere near that number of Li-Ion batteries, I know about the heat they can generate.
I don’t believe it has been mandated unfortunately. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has been recommending this, and similar options since the in-flight fire and successful emergency landing of UPS Flight 1307 at Philadelphia in 2006. This was attributed to Li-ion batteries.The investigative report also noted the cockpit filled with smoke which made the windshield/instruments impossible to see… if I remember correctly the “Air Disasters” program also suggested a clear plastic air bag that would inflate between the windshield/instrument panel and the pilots would have helped. The pilots could simply press their faces against the air bag and have a clear view. I don’t remember if this was ever mandated…
I think most people who use the batteries now realize that it's the nature of the beast. When it occurs, they replace the battery and move on.As long as the cost stays low, I don’t think people will be too upset over a swollen 2 year old battery. They will just get another and hope that one doesn’t swell.
That is exactly the cable channel, program, and episode. I am referring to. But the pallets of Li-Ion batteries were in the entire plane(747). Not just under the cockpit.I also understand UPS packed the batteries in the front of the aircraft, in close proximity to critical flight control equipment, under the flight deck (cockpit) or very close to it. The placing of the batteries wasn’t the cause of the fire but it did greatly shorten the amount of time the flight crew had to take alternative measures… such as ditching at sea if they couldn’t get to a land base. The Smithsonian cable TV channel has a show called “Air Disasters”. One of the episodes was an in-depth study that dealt with the UPS flight you refer to.
I can neither confirm or deny the entire plane was filled with batteries. My recollection of that episode didn’t include the possibility the entire plane was full of batteries, but I’d have to review the episode or read the official cause report from whatever agency handled the investigation… not saying you are incorrect. It may be that I discounted it… because the reason for the crash, the primary cause of the accident, was the inability to see the instrument panels and outside the windshield due to smoke in the cockpit. The pilots were blind, like wearing blacked out face masks I remember using during fire dept self contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) training sessions. So, in my mind, regardless of how many batteries were on board, what mattered was there were at least enough to cause an amount of smoke, which created a zero visibility conditionThat is exactly the cable channel, program, and episode. I am referring to. But the pallets of Li-Ion batteries were in the entire plane(747). Not just under the cockpit.
The investigation was handled by the U.S. Government's NTSB(National Transportation Safety Board).I can neither confirm or deny the entire plane was filled with batteries. My recollection of that episode didn’t include the possibility the entire plane was full of batteries, but I’d have to review the episode or read the official cause report from whatever agency handled the investigation… not saying you are incorrect. It may be that I discounted it… because the reason for the crash, the primary cause of the accident, was the inability to see the instrument panels and outside the windshield due to smoke in the cockpit. The pilots were blind, like wearing blacked out face masks I remember using during fire dept self contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) training sessions. So, in my mind, regardless of how many batteries were on board, what mattered was there were at least enough to cause an amount of smoke, which created a zero visibility condition