Rebanding?

Status
Not open for further replies.

BaLa

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
38
Location
4GRC+83; Temple, TX 76502
I've got an Idea for the Rebanded Systems.

Maybe you guys could add, a field in the dB to 'identify' whether or not a system is rebanded.
Some might say it's easy to see by looking at the Freqs; and that's probably right

But this way one could glance at a system and easily determine whether or not its rebanded.


I looked at this system.
http://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=509
Some of the others might already be marked in a similar fashion.
 
Last edited:

qlajlu

Silent Key
Joined
Jul 25, 2005
Messages
2,286
Reaction score
2
Location
Kearns, Utah
I've got an Idea for the Rebanded Systems.

Maybe you guys could add, a field in the dB to 'identify' whether or not a system is rebanded.
Some might say it's easy to see by looking at the Freqs; and that's probably right

But this way one could glance at a system and easily determine whether or not its rebanded.


I looked at this system.
Scanner Frequencies: Roanoke City / Roanoke County Trunking System, Roanoke, Virginia
Some of the others might already be marked in a similar fashion.
The Database Admin for the Utah area has added a "Misc. System Information" section for the UCAN system, just prior to the frequencies section of the system with the statement that this system is completely rebanded.

I personally think this is good idea and it definitely removes any doubt.
 

BaLa

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2004
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
38
Location
4GRC+83; Temple, TX 76502
Thats good...


Maybe make another field under system voice so it's right there at the top.
But I was thinking something like that.

I figured somebody might have already thought of it.. :p
 

WayneH

Forums Veteran
Super Moderator
Joined
Dec 16, 2000
Messages
7,553
Reaction score
87
Location
Your master site
There's already a flag for individual sites so it's probably just a trivial issue to make it publicly available.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top