• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

RF Bonding Question

jcrmadden

Member
Joined
May 10, 2024
Messages
309
As I understand it RF rides on the outside of conductive materials, and not through.

Wouldn't the inclusion of heat shrink on the outside of bonding straps reduce the available surface area and limit their effectiveness?

Heat shrink definitely makes for a more professional looking install.

There's also some merit with regard to limiting exposure to the elements.

In areas where bonding straps are neither visible nor exposed is heat shrink really necessary?
 

nd5y

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
12,029
Location
Wichita Falls, TX
As I understand it RF rides on the outside of conductive materials, and not through.
Correct. It's known as skin effect.
Wouldn't the inclusion of heat shrink on the outside of bonding straps reduce the available surface area and limit their effectiveness?
No, because shrink tubing and other insulators are noncunductive.
Depending on the dielectric constant and thickness of the material it could vary the electrical length of antenna elements but for grounding and bonding that should not be an issue.
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,635
I was approached by our Project Manager about a grounding problem on a tower next to a fire station.

The "ground window" a large rectangular copper plate where feedline RF lightning protectors and various ground bonds converge, was to be located two stories above the sidewalk and thus four large copper straps (solid copper sheet in a roll) needed to be provided across the width of the plate and extended to the ground rod system below. However, there were vent grills to either side of the wall below. So I recommended doubling up the straps so that there were two pairs taking up half the width and to maximize skin effect, a Lexan plastic separator was used and was secured by nylon bolts to form a copper-plastic-copper sandwich. We had no lightning problems with that solution.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
3,423
Location
Fort Worth
Spent several days building several lengths, and of 8-AWG DC Grounds to accompany the RF Bonds in locations conducive (ha-ha) to “return”.

IMG_2025.jpeg
Taped ends (TESA harness tape) was that fastener, washers, etc already mounted to reduce exertion while laying under vehicle. Drill, grind, mount and “paint”. Done

Heat shrink sounds better for some situations.
I’ve used Liquid Tape at ends on several big truck installs (after crimping).

Hydraulic crimper became one of my favorite install tools quick.

IMG_4039.jpeg

.
 
Last edited:

prcguy

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
17,174
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Spent several days building several lengths, and of 8-AWG DC Grounds to accompany the RF Bonds in locations conducive (ha-ha) to “return”.

View attachment 166585
Taped ends (TESA harness tape) was that fastener, washers, etc already mounted to reduce exertion while laying under vehicle. Drill, grind, mount and “paint”. Done

Heat shrink sounds better for some situations.

Hydraulic crimper became one of my favorite install tools quick.

.
I have the same crimper, it rocks!
 

RFI-EMI-GUY

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2013
Messages
7,635
Hmm; I wonder how much bonding I will need for my new to me Ford Expy when I install the Low Band Syntor X9000? I am going to make a gadget with a low voltage light bulb and some magnetic test leads to bridge doors, hood and rear hatch to see if they are hot.
 

slowmover

Active Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2020
Messages
3,423
Location
Fort Worth
Hmm; I wonder how much bonding I will need for my new to me Ford Expy when I install the Low Band Syntor X9000? I am going to make a gadget with a low voltage light bulb and some magnetic test leads to bridge doors, hood and rear hatch to see if they are hot.

Arguments appear to favor “least”. But that means you have to have the right pieces bonded.

My take, FWIW, is that it’s a matter of horizontal, first, and vertical as catch can. Keep checking noise level after major pieces done to eliminate “wasted” effort. Why I incorporated 12VDC was to not worry over the above and look to get the odd pieces also (bumpers, hitch receiver, etc) as I’m not aware of a method for testing in advance.

@prcguy “advancing/receding waterfall” idea (from antenna base outwards) bonding top surface sheet makes sense once I rustle up the nerve to try it. A-pillar to hood & front door junction looks promising. As does back-of-cab to interior walls of pickup bed. Now I’m interested in prediction more than before.

.
 
Top