I really don't think a device like that is meant to replace your current smartphone, but rather is to supplement your current smartphone.
With regards to the quality of the device, it is still being "beta tested", as far as I can tell.
I both agree AND disagree about all-in-one "combo devices". For example, Garmin had a Nüvifone years ago. I did try it and wanted it for three things:
1) Navigation,
2) Entertainment, and
3) Telephone Calls/Texts
In retrospect, it DID actually work for ALL of those things. Th problem was when I was navigating to a location and streaming music, it was fine...until a call came in and then I was no longer able to navigate and listen to music!
Other "Swiss Army Knife" devices are a compromise, too, of course. For example, many people have a Leatherman or Gerber multi-tool. They do a lot of things, but rarely are they as good as a "one trick pony" device.
Plain Smartphones are like that, too. For example, many people use a smartphone to take photographs. So much so, that I rarely see stand alone camera. Are dedicated cameras "better"? Of course they are! Despite that, I sure see a LOT of people taking snapshots with their smartphones!
I am something of a flashlight guy. Is a dedicated flashlight better than using the flashlight on a smartphone? Usually it is. Despite that, I still see a lot of people using their smartphone as a flashlight! (I still think it is kind of ridiculous.)
What about calculators? Are smartphones better than stand alone, dedicated calculators? I doubt it. Nevertheless, I see a lot of people using their smartphone as a calculator!
What about MP3 players? Are dedicated MP3 players better than storing MP3s on a smartphone? At this point, I don't even know. Can you even still buy a brand new, dedicated MP3 player?
We went through this with hammy radios in the past, too. For example, is a dual-band VHF/UHF radio "better" than separate, single band radios?
What about multi-mode, multi-band radios (DC-to-daylight). Are they better than separate VHFUHF/HF radios?