RS Outdoor Antenna. Does it suck?

Status
Not open for further replies.

UncleGut

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Location
Ooltewah
just by looking at it i would say yes...it does suck...but what do i know
 

loumaag

Silent Key - Aug 2014
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
12,935
Reaction score
11
Location
Katy, TX
Actually the 20-176 works pretty well for what it is. I have several and even use it as a 2M and 70CM ham antenna. It does not work well indoors, it will work much better up and away from other objects. Remember to use good coax for a run of anything over 12 to 15 feet. The antenna will not function well for Lo-Band VHF (30-50MHz), it does start working pretty well when you get to the Aircraft band and will function pretty well up through the 800MHz band, but it is just a ground plane type, don't expect to hear something that you need a diretional gain antenna to suck in. :D
 

UncleGut

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Location
Ooltewah
hey loumaag im thinking of getting the $69.99 rs discone antenna...what do you think about that one?
 

loumaag

Silent Key - Aug 2014
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
12,935
Reaction score
11
Location
Katy, TX
UncleGut said:
hey loumaag im thinking of getting the $69.99 rs discone antenna...what do you think about that one?
I would say spend an an extra $20 and buy a real one. The RS Discone truly does suck. You can search the forums for my past rants on the POS.
 

UncleGut

Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2005
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Location
Ooltewah
im looking for a really good one to go with the new rs digital scanner that just came out...i'll be getting the scanner in about a week (hopefully) and i really need a good outside antenna that does well in all bands. any suggestions?
 

loumaag

Silent Key - Aug 2014
Joined
Oct 20, 2002
Messages
12,935
Reaction score
11
Location
Katy, TX
UncleGut said:
... i really need a good outside antenna that does well in all bands. any suggestions?
Well, based on the requirement that you need an antenna for "all bands", the discone is the answer that first comes to mind. Just not the RS one. A discone will provide somewhat acceptable performance on VHF-LO but will start working pretty well above that and pretty fair all the way to 1300Mhz. My main base scanner antenna is a discone (but I monitor no VHF-LO); however it is the replacement for the pile of junk I maintain in the corner of the shack to remind me never to buy another RS Discone. It is a Diamond D130J, which I bought from The Ham Station and they appear to have on sale right now for $84.95.
 

nexus

Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2002
Messages
1,654
Reaction score
1
Location
Mississippi
The RS Discone I bought broke a few months after owning it. One of the elements snapped off leaving the threaded end still screwed into the base. I would not advise it. Look here:

I hear this antenna is pretty dependable and it's wideband just like the discone. But if you want a discone you should look to DIAMOND antennas and get their discone.

SCANTENNA:
http://www.grove-ent.com/ANT7.html
 

fourwd1

Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2002
Messages
426
Reaction score
115
Location
Socialist state of MD
That's strange. my RS discones work fine on low band and have been up for years with no problems. What'er you all doing to them ?
(Antenna abuse, not a pretty picture)
 

radioscan

Radio Sensei
Database Admin
Joined
Aug 15, 2001
Messages
2,189
Reaction score
76
Location
Southern Ohio
I have been using my Diamond D-103J Discone for 18 years now at two
different locations ( I moved 15 miles north of my former QTH 7 years ago).
For all band its a great performer, and considering its age it holds up to
the weather the best from what I have ever used. It is still in very good shape.

Although I have RG-213U on mine, I suggest using LMR-400 coax for it.
You find some good deals on LMR-400 on Ebay. I use LMR-400 on my 800 MHz beam.

Mark
 

kd7gxu

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 2, 2004
Messages
205
Reaction score
0
Location
Archer, WY
The antenna functions very vell for $23.99. They recently raised the price from $19.99. The only complaint that I have is that the parts are fragile. I live in Wyoming and the brutal winds have snapped off groundplane legs. Th antenna has good receive on VHF hi, UHF and 800, and I have used it for transmit on 146 and 440 mhz. They are very light and easy to mount. Just take a 1" conduit and run the coax up through it and the coax can also suport it to a reasonable height. This antenna is not actually a discone, and a discone will have wider receive coverage. Make sure you use good coax!


Jason
 

safetyobc

Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2004
Messages
3,354
Reaction score
34
Location
South Arkansas
thanks for the info. I am still undecided. My father-in-law said the next time he goes to rs he is going to buy him one of those antennas and get one for me also. Can't complain if a nice feller wants to give me one.
 

mrtnj

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Actually, that antenna really isn't THAT bad --- As noted, it's not the best, however, for what it costs, and that ANY discone is a compromise in the first place, it's ok --- especially if someone is kind enough to get one for you for free. :)

Like any radio system --- the antenna (and connecting cable) are usually the weak points -- A crappy antenna, or crappy cable will make the best equipment not worth anything except to collect dust.

Never skimp here.....but --- that doesn't mean you have to buy the most expensive parts either! For cheap --- get it, try it.... They have a good return policy --- keep all the pieces and parts and packaging in case you want to return it.

YOU know what you want to be able to listen to, and you have to start somewhere --- If it improves what you're interested in, then you're all set. If it's no different than the dummy load you have now, then, bring it back, and you now have some reference of experience to work with.

The best antenna, is one that's resonant on your FREQ (note 1 freq, not all of them) --- If your interest are predominately in the UHF range, then you should be looking at an antenna that favors THAT range, NOT VHF, or HF.

The caveat to all this that I've learned over the years ---- bigger IS better to a lot of degree --- RECEIVING radios care much less that the antenna resonance in the long run than they do about capturing as much of the signal by using more surface than a radio that TRANSMITS.

Given the range of VHF and UHF signals, just about ANYthing you can get up on your roof will be far far far better than what comes with your personal radio.

Note, that you can MAKE your own antenna VERY simply and VERY cheaply, and there's a lot of information available for free on how to do these things.....

Hmmm..... Ok --- after all that's said and done --- TRY IT! It might work just fine for you, where it has proven to be sub-standard for others. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top