rbritton1201
Captain1201
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
- Messages
- 407
I'm in the process of programming St. Charles County, St. Louis County, and Jefferson County into individual favorites lists in my BCD436HP, so I can turn those favorites lists on and off as I travel through those Counties. I notice there's a large list of "INTEROP" talk groups in the Sentinel data base, especially within St. Louis County, and I also notice there's duplication of talk groups and frequencies between the three counties, as though they all share the S.L.A.T.E.R. network, but have different assigned talk groups according to agency. I assume having all of those "INTEROP" talk groups in the mix slows down the scan sequence, having to scan through all the talk groups that may not be active most of the time.
When I review the S.L.A.T.E.R. published materials, it seems there are quite a few more tower locations that form a network compared to what I see with respect to MOSWIN. I get the impression the S.L.A.T.E.R. towers are interconnected so all the agencies that are members of S.L.A.T.E.R. are able to communicate through these towers within the network, no matter where they may be traveling within the S.L.A.T.E.R. network, whether within their venues or outside their venues, provided they're within the proximity of a S.L.A.T.E.R. network tower.
Are all law enforcement agencies with these three Counties subscribed to the totality of the S.L.A.T.E.R. network?
If I'm only interested in monitoring the main dispatch channels and car to car traffic as I pass through those Counties, can I eliminate most of the "INTEROP" talk groups from programming?
Are S.L.A.T.E.R towers interconnected throughout the entire network? It seems I've heard that the BCD436HP isn't probably the best choice for Simulcast transmissions if the network is all interconnected.
Do the various towers become active as you enter their coverage areas, and do towers that are sometimes in close proximity to one another cause the BCD436HP to have difficulty decoding competing transmissions? The S.L.A.T.E.R. towers seem to have a much more limited range compared to MOSWIN towers, but there are more of them to form what seems to be a common network.
I'm just wanting to get a basic understanding of how the S.L.A.T.E.R. system works so I can program more effectively, and not have a lot of extra stuff programmed into the scanner that the scanner has to scan through, thereby missing more important traffic due to a latency issue (ie: time spent scanning INTEROP talk groups that aren't in use much other than under special circumstances.
When I review the S.L.A.T.E.R. published materials, it seems there are quite a few more tower locations that form a network compared to what I see with respect to MOSWIN. I get the impression the S.L.A.T.E.R. towers are interconnected so all the agencies that are members of S.L.A.T.E.R. are able to communicate through these towers within the network, no matter where they may be traveling within the S.L.A.T.E.R. network, whether within their venues or outside their venues, provided they're within the proximity of a S.L.A.T.E.R. network tower.
Are all law enforcement agencies with these three Counties subscribed to the totality of the S.L.A.T.E.R. network?
If I'm only interested in monitoring the main dispatch channels and car to car traffic as I pass through those Counties, can I eliminate most of the "INTEROP" talk groups from programming?
Are S.L.A.T.E.R towers interconnected throughout the entire network? It seems I've heard that the BCD436HP isn't probably the best choice for Simulcast transmissions if the network is all interconnected.
Do the various towers become active as you enter their coverage areas, and do towers that are sometimes in close proximity to one another cause the BCD436HP to have difficulty decoding competing transmissions? The S.L.A.T.E.R. towers seem to have a much more limited range compared to MOSWIN towers, but there are more of them to form what seems to be a common network.
I'm just wanting to get a basic understanding of how the S.L.A.T.E.R. system works so I can program more effectively, and not have a lot of extra stuff programmed into the scanner that the scanner has to scan through, thereby missing more important traffic due to a latency issue (ie: time spent scanning INTEROP talk groups that aren't in use much other than under special circumstances.
Last edited: