Sacramento P25 system

[hexagon_keyhole]

CALAW8 - Folsom PD
CALAW9 - Citrus Heights PD
CAFIRE1 - SRFECC City/County
8TAC91 - Elk Grove PD
CTAC 4 - SacRT Light Rail
CTAC 7 - Los Rios PD
CTAC 9 - Sac Sheriff East
CTAC 10 - Sac Sheriff West
CTAC 11 - UC Davis PD
CTAC 12 - West Sacramento PD
CTAC 13 - Sacramento PD East
CTAC 14 - Sacramento PD North
CTAC 15 - Sacramento PD South
CTAC 16 - Sacramento PD Central

Just heard over the scanner that SacPD is undergoing some sort of radio maintenance right now and moving over to CTAC channels.

Just tuned over to Fire, and notice that the Robo Dispatcher is ending the call with "Operations CTAC2." Is this a new thing or because of the radio maintenance, too?

 

[hexagon_keyhole]

Just heard over the scanner that SacPD is undergoing some sort of radio maintenance right now and moving over to CTAC channels.

Just tuned over to Fire, and notice that the Robo Dispatcher is ending the call with "Operations CTAC2." Is this a new thing or because of the radio maintenance, too?

...and they are back. SPD1 and SPD4 just did a radio roll call.

 

[CityNewsSupport]

...and they are back. SPD1 and SPD4 just did a radio roll call.

C-Tac Channels seem to be used when the P25 Digital system has a Fail or other Issue! If you have room in your scanner it is not a bad Idea to program them in.

 

[dirtrat]

There is no outage! The system is undergoing an upgrade to a newer Motorola release. Agencies are simply going to their backup channels as a precaution in the event something doesn't goes as planned. This is a planned event that will happen every 2 years.

 

[gmclam]

I monitor all the channels, CTAC, trunked, etc.; and yesterday heard a dispatcher indicate there was a "system outage" and calls were being directed to a CTAC. I found it funny because the call came over Fire A1. Obviously not an outage if you're using the very same system to notify everyone.

 

[wski]

Hey yall...I've been sifting through talkgroup PTT data and found some subscribers, mainly dispatch consoles, are registering to site 1017. Does anyone know about this site? Could this be the master/local site controller?

 

[scannerboy02]

Hey yall...I've been sifting through talkgroup PTT data and found some subscribers, mainly dispatch consoles, are registering to site 1017. Does anyone know about this site? Could this be the master/local site controller?

View attachment 131172

Dispatch consoles will often connect via a Console Sub-System Interface (CSSI) that shows a different number than the Radio Frequency Sub-System (RFSS).

 

[mcjones2013]

Talk groups in the 3059-3067 range have been active this weekend. I have them as the former CHAID1-5 (Citrus Heights Mutual Aid), but never had any known usage of them, nor do I think they actually belong to Citrus Heights anymore.

These sound related to the upcoming election, specifically I.T. related functions, possibly with voting machines, or counting machines, or vote centers, based on some keywords heard. 3065 seems to be the most active, with 3061 also having some traffic.

Being these talkgroups were unused and sit right above the "County Services" section of talkgroups when sorted in numerical order, I imagine these now "belong" to County Services, and specifly the Voter Registration & Elections department. Radio IDs are in the 9053xxxx (County Services) and 9190xxxx (Spares/Handouts) range.

 

[ccsochp11]

B

65

38B

391

3B1

3B3

4AA

4F0

517

539

53D

53F

541

545

8F

9D

F1

F2

F3

135

191

193

1C5

201

679

801

9BB

A63

A65

A67

A69

A6B

A6F

A71

A73

A75

A77

A79

A7B

A7D

A7F

A83

A85

A87

A89

A8B

A8D

A8F

A91

A93

A95

A97

A99

A9B

A9D

AA1

AA3

AA5

AA7

AA9

AAD

AAF

AB1

AB3

AB5

AB7

AB9

ABB

ABD

AFB

B01

B37

B39

B9F

C0D

C95

EDB

EDD

EDF

EE1

F23

1415

14A7

2AC9

2BDB

2C1B

2C8B

2DBF

2DD9

2DED

2EB9

2EBF

2F0B

2FDB

3101

32FF

3D3D

456D

4DED

5025

56D1

5A0D

752B

7F0D

88F3

AF0D

DF4D

Does anyone know what talk groups these are? Running unitrunker for the last year and had a ton of talk groups that are unidentified.

 

[mcjones2013]

B	11
65	101
8F	143
9D	157
F1	241
F2	242
F3	243
135	309
191	401
193	403
1C5	453
201	513
38B	907
391	913
3B1	945
3B3	947
4AA	1194
4F0	1264
517	1303
539	1337
53D	1341
53F	1343
541	1345
545	1349
679	1657
801	2049
9BB	2491
A63	2659
A65	2661
A67	2663
A69	2665
A6B	2667
A6F	2671
A71	2673
A73	2675
A75	2677
A77	2679
A79	2681
A7B	2683
A7D	2685
A7F	2687
A83	2691
A85	2693
A87	2695
A89	2697
A8B	2699
A8D	2701
A8F	2703
A91	2705
A93	2707
A95	2709
A97	2711
A99	2713
A9B	2715
A9D	2717
AA1	2721
AA3	2723
AA5	2725
AA7	2727
AA9	2729
AAD	2733
AAF	2735
AB1	2737
AB3	2739
AB5	2741
AB7	2743
AB9	2745
ABB	2747
ABD	2749
AFB	2811
B01	2817
B37	2871
B39	2873
B9F	2975
C0D	3085
C95	3221
EDB	3803
EDD	3805
EDF	3807
EE1	3809
F23	3875
1415	5141
14A7	5287
2AC9	10953
2BDB	11227
2C1B	11291
2C8B	11403
2DBF	11711
2DD9	11737
2DED	11757

 

[mcjones2013]

The higher number ones are likely decode errors. Some might be programming errors on subscriber radios. The even numbered talkgroups are likely programming or decode errors because SRRCS uses odd-numbered talkgroups.

There's some in the UC Davis and Davis (City) range that are known/active.

I see some that were known on the analog system but are no longer in use on the digital system. They might still be programmed in some outside agency radios in error.

There some encrypted stuff in there.

The 2659-2749 I've seen joins as well, but no voice traffic that I've observed. It's a pretty big range so maybe staging for a new agency to join at some point? PURE SPECULATION: Woodland licensed some 800 MHz frequencies for a trunked system, maybe they want to join SRRCS? Less likely, but does Roseville want to obsorb into SRRCS or at least have roaming capability onto SRRCS?

 

[ccsochp11]

Could it also be winters pd?