Sacramento System Question/Concern

[swat]

Can someone double check the system for West Sacramento PD the talkgroups seem to be missed placed when i hear switch to tac my radio shows tac 2 instead can someone please comfirm these ? Thanks And also im not sure if its the WIN 96 files are wrong or not i didnt check

 

[RolnCode3]

Yup. You're right. The DB is incorrect. All of the WS PD tac TGs appear to be incorrect. I'll submit the correct info.

65040 is an Admin channel
65072 is Tac1
65104 is Tac2
65136 T3
65168 T4
65200 T5
65232 T6
65264 T7
65296 Investigators
65392 Training 1

 

[swat]

ok yeah i thought so thanks Bill

 

[RolnCode3]

No problem. I also submitted the corrected TG ID's

 

[mkewman]

this is off topic, but i'd just like to compliment bill on his expert advice, timely responses and accurate information.

 

[RolnCode3]

Aww, shucks. I try, but am most certainly no expert. I appreciate the compliment, Mark.

 

[gmclam]

In the Sacramento Trunk TalkGroup listing, 65392 is now listed 2 times for 2 different purposes. One is for W Sac PD Training 1 and the other is for County Services Maintenance Vendor (city system). Both of these can not be correct - can they?

Thanks,
George

 

[pfish]

Nope. 65392 for sure goes along with the WSPD talkgroups. The entry for County Services must be incorrect.

I can't find the Excel sheet I had with verified talkgroups to see what the County Services talkgroup should be..maybe someone can check.

 

[RolnCode3]

There is no City maintenance vendor TG that I can find listed in the fleetmap. It is wrong. 65392 is 100% associated with West Sac PD.

I'll submit the DB update request.

 

[gmclam]

63592

Nope. 65392 for sure goes along with the WSPD talkgroups. The entry for County Services must be incorrect.

I can't find the Excel sheet I had with verified talkgroups to see what the County Services talkgroup should be..maybe someone can check.

I also think you are correct. When you sort the display by talkgroup ID you will see the two listings. When the WS data was updated, the old ID was not deleted/edited. There is a similar listing at 52400 for maintenance vendor, but the old 65392 listing also says (city site).

 

[RolnCode3]

I also think you are correct. When you sort the display by talkgroup ID you will see the two listings. When the WS data was updated, the old ID was not deleted/edited. There is a similar listing at 52400 for maintenance vendor, but the old 65392 listing also says (city site).

52400 is a County vendor, and exists in the fleetmap. The City vendor, however, does not exist (at least at 65392).

 

[WayneH]

52400 is a County vendor, and exists in the fleetmap. The City vendor, however, does not exist (at least at 65392).

Got it. I didn't check for dupes when I was done.