JoeyC
Senior Member
As we figure out the new names for secure talkgroups, the DB has been updated with a different designation for this one. You called it Secure 2 but the DB says Secure 4.LEC SECURE 2 871h
As we figure out the new names for secure talkgroups, the DB has been updated with a different designation for this one. You called it Secure 2 but the DB says Secure 4.LEC SECURE 2 871h
What are you talking about? Almost everything with LE scanning in SD county is in the clear.Well, sounds like it is almost time to throw in the towel on LE scanning. Only S/O dispatches in the clear right now and that probably won't last. Unless the encrypted agencies want to do everyone a favor and go back to clear mode after things quiet down (unlikely), I wasted my money on new stuff. Now it's fire or nothing it seems...
As we figure out the new names for secure talkgroups, the DB has been updated with a different designation for this one. You called it Secure 2 but the DB says Secure 4.
Part of the reason why LE is turning to encryption is evident in all of the news stories from around the US regarding the use of cell phone apps to monitor LE by the protestors. If people would just shut down their feeds until this problem is over, perhaps the use of encryption would lessen. Just look at all of the news stories about this. I am originally from a Chicago Suburb that was looted this past week and could not believe the number of listeners to Broadcastify at the time of the looting and I doubt whether that was Charlie Civilian living in the affected area. Looters also have phones. It will only be a matter of time before Chicago and New York PDs go to encryption as well.
Should probably just name the DES channels "LEC SECURE 2161" or similar for now until things are fully nailed down. The LEC SECURE 2 designation was used extensively the first night when SDPD went to CEN TAC, as they kept tryijng to wrangle units from CVPD and Harbor, so they kept repeating LEC SECURE 2 over and over on the air on the patch. Typically, we would expect the talkgroups to sequentially increase by ID and by name, but not for sure happening?