Scancontrol with BC895XLT

Status
Not open for further replies.

SlipNutz15

Wacker
Feed Provider
Joined
Aug 6, 2005
Messages
679
Reaction score
151
Location
Central PA
I have installed ScanControl on my computer for my BC895XLT and for some reason it seems to run very slow. Any ideas on how to fix this?
 
Last edited:

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
25,906
Reaction score
2,592
Location
Bowie, Md.
Yes, a few. You might want to read my reviews on Strong Signals; you can find them as links off the software page. To start, check that com port slider on the main screen ; you will need to fool around a bit with it until you find a setting that is fast enough to run the scanner correctly *without* seeing errors, either during control or when you exit. It's almost impossible to state how fast your machine will go, due to com port differences and processor speeds; but somewhere in between 10 and 14 will get you started. It is a matter of experimentation to find the right results.

If you have other specific questions, fire away; and there's a Scan Control Yahoo group where Ken D. (the author) answers lots of tech questions. If I can't help - I've been working with SC since version 3.x - he certainly can. Again, that link exists on the Strong Signals software page.

Here's the link for the Strong Signals software page....

Strong Signals software page

73s Mike
 
Last edited:

SlipNutz15

Wacker
Feed Provider
Joined
Aug 6, 2005
Messages
679
Reaction score
151
Location
Central PA
I got everything working how I want but I have a small problem. ScanControl uses 100% of my CPU and I don't know how to make it not use all of the processor speed. Any ideas/helpful tips?
 

ka3jjz

Wiki Admin Emeritus
Joined
Jul 22, 2002
Messages
25,906
Reaction score
2,592
Location
Bowie, Md.
That would be one for Ken over on the Yahoo group. I don't notice much degradation on my 500 Mhz PC, but that could just be me. The Yahoo group URL can be found on the Strong Signals software page.

73s and GL..Mike
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top