Scanner law question

Status
Not open for further replies.

NS9710

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
772
Reaction score
90
Location
Niagara Falls, NY
When I was last up there around 2010, Minnesota had a law against having a scanner, has this law been modified or done away with?

Does anyone remember this law?

Any further information on it?

Thanks.
 

n0esc

Signals, Secrets, Static
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
285
Reaction score
276
Location
SE MN EN33
When I was last up there around 2010, Minnesota had a law against having a scanner, has this law been modified or done away with?

Does anyone remember this law?

Any further information on it?

Thanks.

MN Statutes 299.C37

Still very much on the books. There is some overlap with the current political and pandemic environment that as long as you aren't doing anything to attract the attention of LE, you'll be left alone, but if they have to interact with you, it's likely that without very good reason, and applicable legal exemptions, scanners can and have gotten seized. Most officers are well aware of sites like broadcastify and all associated apps and web access through phones, and even android auto, so it's gotten less common, but none-the-less the law is still there.
 

ko6jw_2

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
1,473
Reaction score
648
Location
Santa Ynez, CA
The law relates to mobile operation. According to what I have read, there is an exemption for licensed ham radio operators. As mentioned above, there is now a gray area with internet and cell phone scanner apps. More legislation is probably coming.
 

wogggieee

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
131
Location
Hugo , MN
The law to my knowledge has not change and with the increase of steaming scanner apps I'd be doubtful it ever will, at least in the direction of being looser. I don't think its on the radar for most law makers and law enforcement is solving their "problem" by going encrypted. Get you amateur radio license and you will be exempt from most scanner laws around the country.
 

n0esc

Signals, Secrets, Static
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
285
Reaction score
276
Location
SE MN EN33
Certainly wouldn't rule out the possibility, but given that one of the major drivers of the ARMER adoption was the I35 bridge collapse, and the definitive role ARMER had in interoperability compared to other mass casualty disaster response. AMRER / MN DPS is likely a bit skittish to introduce potential issues with cross agency encryption key maintenance. In fact they released a survey last spring regarding a roadmap to improving encryption key distribution and maintenance. In order to maintain the same statewide level of interoperability for every single radio on the system to have access to local regional and statewide TGs, encryption keys and capable radios would need to be standardized and codified into the AMRER user agreements. Forcing smaller volunteer departments or small cities to absorb tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars in equipment upgrades. Many struggled to fund ARMER capable P25 radios in the first place. Might be a tough row to how if DPS forces high cost upgrades without proof of value. I'd imagine you'd see cities and counties dropping their agreements and just going back to standalone systems, totally defeating and undermining the vision of the system in the first place.

2018-2021 Strategic Plan (No Newer Version Yet)

Encryption Survey

I35 Bridge Collapse Report
 

NS9710

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
772
Reaction score
90
Location
Niagara Falls, NY
The reason I asked about this was I have a Uniden SDS100 and am pretty low income and I had to save up quite a while to get it, and I don't want to come out there and get it confiscated.
 

jason_58201

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
162
Reaction score
25
Location
Polk County, MN
The reason I asked about this was I have a Uniden SDS100 and am pretty low income and I had to save up quite a while to get it, and I don't want to come out there and get it confiscated.
Keep it out of site in the car. Don't get stopped. And you won't lose it. There are no roadblocks of Law Enforcement looking for scanners in a car. Follow the rules of the road and you won't get stopped and lose it. Not to sound condescending, but it's pretty logical.
 

wogggieee

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
131
Location
Hugo , MN
The reason I asked about this was I have a Uniden SDS100 and am pretty low income and I had to save up quite a while to get it, and I don't want to come out there and get it confiscated.

The law only applies to use in a car. Keep it in a bag or in a trunk and otherwise off and you shouldn't have an issue.
 

NS9710

Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2010
Messages
772
Reaction score
90
Location
Niagara Falls, NY
I did not take your remarks condescendingly, I just didn't know what the latest on the topic was. Thanks.

Keep it out of site in the car. Don't get stopped. And you won't lose it. There are no roadblocks of Law Enforcement looking for scanners in a car. Follow the rules of the road and you won't get stopped and lose it. Not to sound condescending, but it's pretty logical.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top