Scanners and Facebook

Status
Not open for further replies.

NikonFE2

Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2017
Messages
42
Location
Ohio
I just discovered a public Facebook group for a county I monitor. They are putting on Facebook what they hear on the scanner to keep everyone 'informed'. Isn't this what gives the hobby a bad reputation? And is this legal or not? (They do not list individuals' names.)
 

WX4JCW

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jun 26, 2006
Messages
3,403
Location
Stow, Ohio
yeah mostly it’s people who probably wouldn’t be allowed on Broadcastify, I know of at least 2 that forced departments to encrypt because of their antics, St Lucie County FL being one
 

letarotor

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,053
Location
Arlington, TX
Technically, disseminating information to a third party that wasn't listening to it is illegal or at least it used to be. But I don't think that law ever was enforced and I'm not even sure if it's a law still?

It's just poor judgment I believe when people do stuff like that and it does lead to agencies wanting to go encrypted or hide their communications.

We've had a complete county, Johnson County, on our regional radio system that encrypted all law enforcement communications because one of the agencies in that county was getting sick and tired of having their audio streaming to whoever wanted to listen on a phone. So the whole county encrypted the law enforcement traffic as a result. every police department and sheriff's department radio is now encrypted.

It's a shame that so many people do things that are killing off the hobby they claim to like by doing things online that just hurt all of us. It's not bad having a Facebook group that people from the county who have the same interest talk on. But when somebody's posting information that's coming across the airwaves and just publicly putting it out there, that's not good at all.

Brian
COMMSCAN
 

W9WSS

Retired LEO
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
990
Location
Westmont, DuPage County, IL USA
I feel your pain. In the past year, I spent over $1K on SDS100 (with enhancements) and a 536HP to be able to monitor our Statewide Starcom21 P25 trunked system. Most, if not all, law enforcement, fire, and EMS agencies will be on this system which has been up and running for 10 years. Motorola owns it, and agencies pay xx dollars for the usage of their units on the system.

Fortunately, the agencies I monitor are switching over to TDMA Phase 2 from FDMA. This is all well and good, and for now, the only comms that are encrypted are certain surveillance and drug enforcement agencies in DuPage County. Main dispatch talk groups are in the clear, so we can hear what's going on around us.

I have been informed that DU-COMM and ACDC dispatch centers will eventually encrypt all communications, possibly within the next two years. Cook County agency talk groups are all encrypted and will remain that way permanently. I know it's expected and will happen in DuPage County, so I'm enjoying what I can for the time being. Then there will be no more except for the multi-cast VHF channels tied to fire dispatch talk groups.

For further details, if you're not familiar with Starcom21 in Illinois, here's the WiKi for them:

 

zerg901

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
3,725
Location
yup
The encryption train might be getting derailed very soon. Look at the Lafayette Park incident in DC. Look at the Capitol Police inviting thugs to attack the Capitol.
 

a417

Active Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2004
Messages
4,669
The encryption train might be getting derailed very soon. Look at the Lafayette Park incident in DC. Look at the Capitol Police inviting thugs to attack the Capitol.
...which way are you going with this?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top