Scantenna directivity

Status
Not open for further replies.

OceanaRadio

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
150
Location
Virginia Beach, VA
kb2vxa said:
Hi again,

Here at the Jersey Shore we get violent thunderstorms in summer and are famous for our winter gales, no way in hell would I consider a Scantenna. If you're so concerned with wind damage why bother with something known not to survive and go with something that WILL?

The elements will blow off no matter which way the wind hits them and it gets worse when those vees vibrate like stop signs in a hurricane, the whole idea just blows.

The bottom line is the antenna is a piece of crap and there's no getting away from poor mechanical construction. Well, that is unless you mummify it. (;->)

Warren, I'm going to e-mail you a couple of current AIS screenshots of the scantenna's work from Virginia Beach, VA, right on the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay / Atlantic Ocean, where the wind is as challenging to antennas as any place. You decide from those screenshots if it looks like my scantenna is directional.

I'm still on my first of three scantennas ($9.95ea fm Radio Shack several years ago) and yes I have had to straighten it a bit once or twice. But it is a phenomenol performer, and has consistently equaled or exceeded every other antenna I have compared it to for years.

My only regret is it cannot be used for transmit. And yea, I wish it was a little stronger. But you won't see any storms in 'Jersey that I don't get in spades here, and you would be extremely pleased with it's performance.

Best regards,

Jack
 

fuzzymoto

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
1,048
Actually are we talking the same antenna here? I have the ST-2 which I believe is the sturdier Scantenna and NOT the original weaker Scantenna. Time will tell and as I said earlier I'm only a $39 buy it now away from a new one. I guess I also wasn't aware of any comparable model that worked equally well on the bands I listen to for a comparable price. Is there one? I agree on the eBay comments. This is the year 2006. eBay is a marketplace and as such there will be good and bad people. Don't define eBay by the bad people. I guess if you're willing to pay more for your antenna to deal with a phone and a real person then that's the price. For me I'd rather do the 10-second Buy It Now (no bidding) and have my antenna on the way in minutes not days. Either way it's certainly your choice.
 

OceanaRadio

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
150
Location
Virginia Beach, VA
fuzzymoto said:
Actually are we talking the same antenna here? I have the ST-2 which I believe is the sturdier Scantenna and NOT the original weaker Scantenna. Time will tell and as I said earlier I'm only a $39 buy it now away from a new one. I guess I also wasn't aware of any comparable model that worked equally well on the bands I listen to for a comparable price. Is there one? I agree on the eBay comments. This is the year 2006. eBay is a marketplace and as such there will be good and bad people. Don't define eBay by the bad people. I guess if you're willing to pay more for your antenna to deal with a phone and a real person then that's the price. For me I'd rather do the 10-second Buy It Now (no bidding) and have my antenna on the way in minutes not days. Either way it's certainly your choice.

FM, I have no way of knowing that, sorry. Since mine dates back 5 or more years to when Radio Shack was forced to discontinue them, I think Antenna Warehouse continued to produce them for others including a model under their own name. All I can add is that with the exception of 800mhz where it is a nominal performer, I think the Scantenna is the best all around omni-receive antenna ever made. If it has directionality, I have never noticed it mounted on a 10' steel mast on my second-story roof. I am currently getting surface contacts from multiple directions from over 100 NM and the ducting is evenly distributed due to to very windy conditions. You cannot ask for better than that from a 5+ years old antenna. And it has been through the worst most locations could subject it to.

Cheers,

Jack
Virginia Beach
 

fuzzymoto

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
1,048
I agree and mine has been great. I don't monitor much 800Mhz stuff and what I do listen to is VERY close so it's hard for me to say on 800Mhz.

It was my understanding that the ST-2 was the beefeier version of the original Scantenna. I guess we'll see.
 

n9emz

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
64
Location
Palm Bay, FL
I'm 19-26 miles from the main stations I monitor. I recently moved my Scantenna from a 10' mast mounted on one of my chimneys to my tower....an increase of about 12' in height. Not noticing any directionality and am now grabbing the distant UHF mobile units I previously had problems hearing.

three_ears.JPG
 

sony

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
203
n9emz said:
I'm 19-26 miles from the main stations I monitor. I recently moved my Scantenna from a 10' mast mounted on one of my chimneys to my tower....an increase of about 12' in height. Not noticing any directionality and am now grabbing the distant UHF mobile units I previously had problems hearing.

three_ears.JPG
I lowered my antenna 10 ft from a 20 ft. mast can't really tell any difference yet in reception just that with the 10 ft. mast on the chimney mount I don't need any guy wires like I did before 2 levels of them.
 

n9emz

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
64
Location
Palm Bay, FL
sony said:
I lowered my antenna 10 ft from a 20 ft. mast can't really tell any difference yet in reception just that with the 10 ft. mast on the chimney mount I don't need any guy wires like I did before 2 levels of them.

My antenna was previously buried in the middle of a huge sugar maple and I'm assuming the relocation improved the reception. Also, the antenna was previously ungrounded. The tower has three 6' ground rods lugged together in the soil beneath the tower pad.

There is one problem....occasional intermod on 46.420 ISP statewide channel. I guess I'm catching several stations simultaneously when this happens. Hard to tell....I might realize even more improvement if I replaced the BC178XLT with a more current unit.
 
Last edited:

sony

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
203
n9emz said:
My antenna was previously buried in the middle of a huge sugar maple and I'm assuming the relocation improved the reception. Also, the antenna was previously ungrounded. The tower has three 6' ground rods lugged together in the soil beneath the tower pad.

There is one problem....occasional intermod on 46.420 ISP statewide channel. I guess I'm catching several stations simultaneously when this happens. Hard to tell....I might realize even more improvement if I replaced the BC178XLT with a more current unit.

How much of a difference does grounding effect your reception?
 

n9emz

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
64
Location
Palm Bay, FL
sony said:
How much of a difference does grounding effect your reception?

I haven't really noticed any significant difference regarding scanner reception, but grounding sure helped cut down noise in my HF gear. It also eliminated static buildup and occasional arcing in one of my transmitters.
 

sony

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
203
n9emz said:
I haven't really noticed any significant difference regarding scanner reception, but grounding sure helped cut down noise in my HF gear. It also eliminated static buildup and occasional arcing in one of my transmitters.

What is the best/easiest way to ground the antenna if it is 10 feet high above the roof and another 10 to 15 feet to the ground so anywhere from 20 to 25 feet + above the ground surface?
 

n9emz

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
64
Location
Palm Bay, FL
Sorry....I'm not getting here often enough as I'm spread pretty thin on time. I honestly don't know the best way. I've always used 00 stranded copper wire from the base of my roof-mounted mast to a standard 6' copperclad ground rod driven into the ground. I also run minimum 4-ga solid copper wire from my equipment chasis to a bus bar which is also connected to the ground rod using 00 stranded copper wire.

In this instance, after digging the hole for my concrete tower pad, I drove three ground rods into the bottom of the hole, lugged them together with 00 stranded copper wire, and lugged that mess to one leg of the tilt up base. All my equipment grounds are bussed and connected to one leg of the tower base.

In the last ten years I've taken direct lightning strikes to two huge sugar maple trees; one within 25' of my antenna system, and the other about 75' away. No equipment was harmed. Considering that the tip of my vertical antenna is higher than the trees, I figure I must have done something right.

Time for someone else who really knows this stuff to comment.
 

sony

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
203
n9emz said:
Sorry....I'm not getting here often enough as I'm spread pretty thin on time. I honestly don't know the best way. I've always used 00 stranded copper wire from the base of my roof-mounted mast to a standard 6' copperclad ground rod driven into the ground. I also run minimum 4-ga solid copper wire from my equipment chasis to a bus bar which is also connected to the ground rod using 00 stranded copper wire.

In this instance, after digging the hole for my concrete tower pad, I drove three ground rods into the bottom of the hole, lugged them together with 00 stranded copper wire, and lugged that mess to one leg of the tilt up base. All my equipment grounds are bussed and connected to one leg of the tower base.

In the last ten years I've taken direct lightning strikes to two huge sugar maple trees; one within 25' of my antenna system, and the other about 75' away. No equipment was harmed. Considering that the tip of my vertical antenna is higher than the trees, I figure I must have done something right.

Do you have any pics of this? It would seem to be that we are looking at least 20 ft. of cooper wire or aluminium wire wrapped around antenna mast (Which part?) to ground spike.
 
Last edited:

sony

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
203
What are those 2 wires leading to ground for?

n9emz said:
I'm 19-26 miles from the main stations I monitor. I recently moved my Scantenna from a 10' mast mounted on one of my chimneys to my tower....an increase of about 12' in height. Not noticing any directionality and am now grabbing the distant UHF mobile units I previously had problems hearing.

three_ears.JPG

Are these the grounding wires?
 
Last edited:

OceanaRadio

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
150
Location
Virginia Beach, VA
n9emz said:
Another link that might be helpful: Types of Grounds, Etc.

That so-called "Tech Bench Elmer" is among the most clueless of the Amateur community, which taken as a whole, are a danger to themselves and others on the subject of grounding and lightning protection.

It is hard to finish a single paragraph on the entire page that doesn't exhibit a complete lack of understanding of the subject matter. It is basically a collection of dumbest wives-tales on grounding and lightning protection. They have become Ham-tales over the years as they are repeated enough times.

Jack
 

sony

Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2006
Messages
203
OceanaRadio said:
That so-called "Tech Bench Elmer" is among the most clueless of the Amateur community, which taken as a whole, are a danger to themselves and others on the subject of grounding and lightning protection.

It is hard to finish a single paragraph on the entire page that doesn't exhibit a complete lack of understanding of the subject matter. It is basically a collection of dumbest wives-tales on grounding and lightning protection. They have become Ham-tales over the years as they are repeated enough times.

Jack
??? ROFLAO.
 
Last edited:

n9emz

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
64
Location
Palm Bay, FL
OceanaRadio said:
That so-called "Tech Bench Elmer" is among the most clueless of the Amateur community, which taken as a whole, are a danger to themselves and others on the subject of grounding and lightning protection.

It is hard to finish a single paragraph on the entire page that doesn't exhibit a complete lack of understanding of the subject matter. It is basically a collection of dumbest wives-tales on grounding and lightning protection. They have become Ham-tales over the years as they are repeated enough times.

Jack

I'd appreciate it if you'd be more specific. I'm always open to newer, better, and especially safer ways of doing things.

Thanks and regards,

Sam
 

OceanaRadio

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
150
Location
Virginia Beach, VA
Sam, I shouldn't make statements I don't have the time to qualify. You are welcome to examine my findings on the subject at the website below, and make your own conclusions about the safest way to provide lightning protection for your station. This is off-topic for the scantenna thread so if you have any further questions you may write me off-line, or please start a new thread.

See: http://members.cox.net/oceanaradio/grounding.htm

Rgds,

Jack
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top