SDS200 - Best Filter selection for Simulcast P25 Phase 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

rvacs

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
414
Location
Tulsa, OK
Hello All,

Battling a little with reception right now...sure I will get this resolved with a better antenna.
I know a lot of people have different needs for the "FILTER" setting.

Just curious what most use for a Simulcast P25 Phase 1 system.
Options for the site are:
GLOBAL (Default)
Normal
Invert
Auto
Wide Normal
Wide Invert
Wide Auto
Off
(This is what I am currently on).

** Seems my reception is a tad bit better on OFF. But if we think it may be better decode on another let me know.
I have been using Analyze System to check Signal (S) and Decode (Q).

Also love to hear of any suggestions on inside antenna that has worked for others over the telescopic.

THANK YOU !!
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,416
Location
VA
The best filter setting depends on whether potentially interfering signals are above or below the frequency you're trying to receive, and how far. So the best settings for you will vary by frequency, and other people's best settings are irrelevant.
 

n1chu

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 18, 2002
Messages
2,383
Location
Farmington, Connecticut
I have found it’s a case of “Your Results may Vary”. Meaning you should try different filter settings and go with the best. Don’t expect to be able to differentiate between filters either... if the signal is strong it just may be no one setting is found to be better. Try a setting and compare to “Off”. If you see a difference, go with it. If not, leave settings off. This applies to a home base station where the antenna never moves. All bets are off for portable and mobile use.
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
5,540
Location
Chicago , IL
I own 2-SDS200's and have been using the Attenuator on a statewide 700mhz. system. I also have a conventional P25 700mhz system that this was needed too. In addition Wide Invert appears to work best in my location.
 

Bolt21

Spark Chariot Driver
Joined
Dec 28, 2005
Messages
1,563
Location
Punta Piñal
My theory (for the SDS100 - same filters) is that if you're stationary, find the filter that produces the lowest error rates/least garbled audio. If you're mobile, use the Auto or Wide-Auto filter to compensate for any varying interference that you may encounter during your travels. Don't know if this is the correct theory, but it's the best that I can come up with that works for me.

For me, best reception for P25 P1 systems is with Wide-Inv while stationary and Wide-Auto while mobile. And it's also worth mentioning that I have not found a filter that prevents missed transmissions every once in a while. While the SDS is a huge improvement with simulcast over the previous Unidens, they are not perfect, and that is to be expected, I guess.
 
Last edited:

n1chu

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 18, 2002
Messages
2,383
Location
Farmington, Connecticut
My theory (for the SDS100 - same filters) is that if you're stationary, find the filter that produces the lowest error rates/least garbled audio. If you're mobile, use the auto/wide auto filter to compensate for any varying interference that you may encounter during your travels. Don't know if this is the correct theory, but it's the best that I can come up with that works for me.

For me, best reception for P25 P1 systems is with Wide-Inv while stationary and Wide-Auto while mobile. And it's also worth mentioning that I have not found a filter that prevents missed transmissions every once in a while. While the SDS is a huge improvement with simulcast over the previous Unidens, they are not perfect, and that is to be expected, I guess.
I think it’s always been the case that missing some calls are part of the game. All scanners miss calls or parts of calls by design. But with the scan rates we enjoy today we can reasonably expect to capture most.

The only way we can guarantee no missed calls or parts of calls is to dedicate a radio to a frequency or talk-group and do not allow it to scan other agencies. But we could dedicate older scanners to “Hold” on a channel permanently. Get enough receivers/scanners set up during a multiple agency call and you’ve got quite a Party!
 

Bolt21

Spark Chariot Driver
Joined
Dec 28, 2005
Messages
1,563
Location
Punta Piñal
The only way we can guarantee no missed calls or parts of calls is to dedicate a radio to a frequency or talk-group and do not allow it to scan other agencies.
I routinely miss transmissions, even when holding on a specific TG. Just part of it. Anyways, didn't mean to derail the thread topic of filters...
 
  • Like
Reactions: RRR

rvacs

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
414
Location
Tulsa, OK

hiegtx

Mentor
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
10,969
Location
Dallas, TX
@werinshades - you said -

How do I know if it is Analog or Digital? I think its Digital - but not sure system tells me. It is the Greater Austin Regional Radio System (GATTRS) - Greater Austin/Travis Regional Radio System (GATRRS) Trunking System, Austin, Texas - Scanner Frequencies
GATRRS is digital.
83161
Any system with a system type listed as 'Project 25', regardless of whether it's Phase I & II, is digital. You may also see systems that are Motorola Type II, but 'system voice' includes 'APCO 25'. Those may be using only digital, or a mix of both digital and analog talkgroups.
83162

The volume offset can be used on any talkgroup, regardless of whether it is digital or analog.

For a trunked system, the modulation settings (auto, FM, or NFM) for non-P25 systems can set for each site. For P25 systems, Phase I or Phase II, the setting is set automatically, and cannot be edited.
 

n1chu

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 18, 2002
Messages
2,383
Location
Farmington, Connecticut
I routinely miss transmissions, even when holding on a specific TG.
Thats why I included the term “dedicated radio”. When it’s listening it don’t miss a thing! But I wonder why you are missing stuff if you have it locked down on a specific TG? And you are accepting it as “It is what it is”? Has Uniden given you the impression these drop-outs are to be expected? I don’t doubt you. Just wondering if I missed Uniden documentation that says we should accept these occasional drop-outs on occasion, even when locked down on a TG.
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,416
Location
VA
Just wondering if I missed Uniden documentation that says we should accept these occasional drop-outs on occasion, even when locked down on a TG.
If you read the Uniden documentation, you'll discover that the scanner will scan all sites in range, even when holding on a talkgroup. If you don't want to miss anything, you have to hold on the TG and on a system site that carries it.
 

n1chu

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 18, 2002
Messages
2,383
Location
Farmington, Connecticut
That’s what I was led to believe. So, I take from from your post if I have the scanner locked down on a specific TG I shouldn’t experience drop-outs... apparently just accepting drop-outs as “It’s the nature of the beast”, meaning scanners, is incorrect. Thank you for the guidance.
 

kruser

Active Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
4,957
Location
Central St Louis Cnty, MO
That’s what I was led to believe. So, I take from from your post if I have the scanner locked down on a specific TG I shouldn’t experience drop-outs... apparently just accepting drop-outs as “It’s the nature of the beast”, meaning scanners, is incorrect. Thank you for the guidance.
If the TG traffic you want is not carried on all sites, you still risk missing traffic as the scanner checks the other sites for traffic.
Holding on the specific TG and Site that carries the TG will provide the best chance at not missing traffic as jonwienke explained.
 

rvacs

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
414
Location
Tulsa, OK
Thanks @hiegtx and @n1chu for your help.
I figured it was digital - thank.

@kruser - I am only scanning 6 talk group dispatch channels. And only using the tower those 6 talkgroups are on.

I have ordered a directional yagi to see if I can get my S (signal) improved.
It usually hovers around 1/3 height on scale and Q (quality) is at the top. But missing lots of conv. my G5 picks up with no problem with its little antenna right near it (scanning same site and same talkgroups). If I can get my signal better for the SDS think I will be golden.
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
5,540
Location
Chicago , IL
If the TG traffic you want is not carried on all sites, you still risk missing traffic as the scanner checks the other sites for traffic.
Holding on the specific TG and Site that carries the TG will provide the best chance at not missing traffic as jonwienke explained.

After reading many posts on these threads, I don't think some here understand how trunking systems work, what the scanner has to do with control channel sites etc. This is especially true with larger and statewide systems. I scan 2 sites from home that are within my range, both sites carry almost identical traffic with the exception of a handful of talkgroups. In addition, I also "scan" with my scanner many other systems..mish mosh of analog, trunking etc. Had to respond so you know your post didn't fall on deaf ears...lol!
 

Bolt21

Spark Chariot Driver
Joined
Dec 28, 2005
Messages
1,563
Location
Punta Piñal
Use auto if you want to s l o w your scanning rate waaay down. I wouldn't recommend it.
With conventional channels, yes. With trunked systems, scanning one site at least, I don't see any noticeable difference. If the control channel is directing the scanner to the proper LCN, how much "scanning" is really being done, and how much can it really be slowed by Auto?
 

alphaacres

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
208
Location
Oswego, New York
I use the RSSI to find the best filter just look in Proscan history log and you will see the difference lower RSSI numbers is better mine is wide normal for the P25 system I listen to.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top