SDS200 Indoor antenna?

Status
Not open for further replies.

scnrfrq

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
985
Reaction score
55
Location
Erie, PA
What's the best indoor antenna for the SDS200? I can't put anything outside. None of the whip antennas I've tried have worked on simulcast systems.
 

trentbob

Silent Key W3BUX
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
6,929
Reaction score
8,208
Location
Bucks County, PA
What's the best indoor antenna for the SDS200? I can't put anything outside. None of the whip antennas I've tried have worked on simulcast systems.
You can always use the outdoor antenna of your choice by mounting it on a floor lamp, possibly in conjunction with a broom handle with 10 ft of low loss coax..

You would then have some latitude to move it around and rotate it for the best reception.
 

dave3825

* * * * * * * * * * * *
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 17, 2003
Messages
10,439
Reaction score
6,016
Location
Suffolk County NY
What kind of house and where is the scanner located? The antenna that comes with the 200 works fine on simulcast. I listen to a few.
 

n1chu

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 18, 2002
Messages
3,187
Reaction score
990
Location
Farmington, Connecticut
Simulcast presents its own problems, where more is not necessarily better. So, poking an antenna outside of your window, while beneficial for conventional stuff, may make overcoming simulcast issues worse. There have bed. Many posts proclaiming a paper clip does better on simulcast systems than anything else they’ve tried. The floor lamp/broom handle approach is a variant of this. It gives you the ability to change where you locate your antenna without having to move your scanner. The scanner is placed where you want it annd the antenna is moved around looking for its permanent home. It could be just a matter of inches or feet. (I only use the sites best suited for my home when programming these systems. And low loss coax is always a must when working with the higher 700/800MHz frequencies, where most all simulcast issues are found to be present. It’s hit or miss with simulcast. The guy next door may be able to hear stuff you can’t, all because they’ve found that “sweet spot” a place to park their antenna. In my case, I use 50 feet of LMR400 coax to connect an outside rooftop directional antenna. It’s thick and stiff but a short piece (just enough to allow for the tight bends needed to make the final connection to the scanner) of more flexible coax is used as a jumper to connect to the scanner. They make low loss cable just as good (or maybe even better) that is thinner also. But I don’t have simulcast issues, at least not yet!
 

trentbob

Silent Key W3BUX
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
6,929
Reaction score
8,208
Location
Bucks County, PA
Simulcast presents its own problems, where more is not necessarily better. So, poking an antenna outside of your window, while beneficial for conventional stuff, may make overcoming simulcast issues worse. There have bed. Many posts proclaiming a paper clip does better on simulcast systems than anything else they’ve tried. The floor lamp/broom handle approach is a variant of this. It gives you the ability to change where you locate your antenna without having to move your scanner. The scanner is placed where you want it annd the antenna is moved around looking for its permanent home. It could be just a matter of inches or feet. (I only use the sites best suited for my home when programming these systems. And low loss coax is always a must when working with the higher 700/800MHz frequencies, where most all simulcast issues are found to be present. It’s hit or miss with simulcast. The guy next door may be able to hear stuff you can’t, all because they’ve found that “sweet spot” a place to park their antenna. In my case, I use 50 feet of LMR400 coax to connect an outside rooftop directional antenna. It’s thick and stiff but a short piece (just enough to allow for the tight bends needed to make the final connection to the scanner) of more flexible coax is used as a jumper to connect to the scanner. They make low loss cable just as good (or maybe even better) that is thinner also. But I don’t have simulcast issues, at least not yet!
The poster here is using an sds-200 which has an SDR chip which overcomes simulcast distortion.

The paper clip method that you talk about was one of the many gimmicks, like drilling a hole in a empty paint can and putting the rubber duck in it to overcome simulcast issues and is certainly not the same as a good quality rooftop antenna mounted on a floor lamp or tripod.
 

scnrfrq

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
985
Reaction score
55
Location
Erie, PA
What kind of house and where is the scanner located? The antenna that comes with the 200 works fine on simulcast. I listen to a few.
2 story house with scanner in bedroom. I have been using a suction cup antenna on the window, but now it seems a lot weaker.
 

dave3825

* * * * * * * * * * * *
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Feb 17, 2003
Messages
10,439
Reaction score
6,016
Location
Suffolk County NY
2 story house with scanner in bedroom.
What floor? Scanner near a window?

I have been using a suction cup antenna on the window, but now it seems a lot weaker.
Which model? If it's not tuned for the freqs the simulcast system uses it might not be that good.


What is the system that's coming in weak and how far from the tower are you?
 

n1chu

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Oct 18, 2002
Messages
3,187
Reaction score
990
Location
Farmington, Connecticut
The poster here is using an sds-200 which has an SDR chip which overcomes simulcast distortion.

The paper clip method that you talk about was one of the many gimmicks, like drilling a hole in a empty paint can and putting the rubber duck in it to overcome simulcast issues and is certainly not the same as a good quality rooftop antenna mounted on a floor lamp or tripod.
I am aware it a SDS200… I’ve got two of them. The paper clip was just one example, driving towards the intended method of moving the antenna, trying differing antennas, etc., granted, these ideas were offered to those who were t using an SDR receiver. But mostly to point out it the location of the antenna that’s important. An outside antenna isn’t necessarily the answer. And while I am not bothered by simulcast issues (as my BCD325P2 works just fine), the software defined radio microprocessor chip you refer to isn’t infallible. The SDS200 may still have the need for tweaking the location and type of antenna used. Thanks for pointing out the various “tweaks” that were offered for those having trouble with simulcast when using the BCD436 and 536’s. That point completely slipped my mind.
 

trentbob

Silent Key W3BUX
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
6,929
Reaction score
8,208
Location
Bucks County, PA
I am aware it a SDS200… I’ve got two of them. The paper clip was just one example, driving towards the intended method of moving the antenna, trying differing antennas, etc., granted, these ideas were offered to those who were t using an SDR receiver. But mostly to point out it the location of the antenna that’s important. An outside antenna isn’t necessarily the answer. And while I am not bothered by simulcast issues (as my BCD325P2 works just fine), the software defined radio microprocessor chip you refer to isn’t infallible. The SDS200 may still have the need for tweaking the location and type of antenna used. Thanks for pointing out the various “tweaks” that were offered for those having trouble with simulcast when using the BCD436 and 536’s. That point completely slipped my mind.
Yeah my County went Phase ll simulcast in 2015, rendering the x36 useless just a year or so after getting them. We had to go over to apx radios to pick up my counties system.

Back to topic, the SDS radios handle simulcast very well, as you know, but the original poster here might be having issues with being out of range of the system he's trying to pick up, hence my recommendation for a rooftop antenna mounted on a inexpensive floor lamp or tripod using low loss coax.

Moving it around will certainly help with being out of range, in addition the poster could also apply filters to the sites of the system.

Dave seems to be on track with that.. too far from system, possibly out of range and window stick on antenna not appropriate frequency coverage.
 

nessnet

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 22, 2007
Messages
2,137
Reaction score
1,616
Location
What month is it?
What's the best indoor antenna for the SDS200? I can't put anything outside. None of the whip antennas I've tried have worked on simulcast systems.

There has been good info posted above already, so just a couple of thoughts /questions.
First, I agree, this sounds like it is not even a simulcast problem, but a signal strength problem.

So, the next question is more of a what and a where.

What system are you trying to hear?
It's transmit frequencies determine what antenna to use (800, use an 800 - VHF, use a VHF, etc, etc.).
An 800 antenna will work for 800 - VHF, not so much.
THere are fairly good wideband antennas, but they are a compromise - OK at most freq, great at none.
If signal strength is indeed the issue, narrowing down the frequency of the antenna becomes important.

Then the where.
If you are far away from the nearest transmitter, you need an antenna with gain - maybe even a directional antenna (Google "Yagi").
Low loss cable is also very important.

As to your suction cup antenna. They are usually cheap and thus, use crappy, high loss cable.

The more info you post here, the better we can help you.
 
Last edited:

scnrfrq

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
985
Reaction score
55
Location
Erie, PA
At this point I'm using 2 other suction cups with pretty good results. I'm now moving this one around on the window to see what happens. If no luck I'll post more on here for antenna info.
 

W9THR

Member- long time listener, first time caller
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
29
Reaction score
26
Location
indianapolis, indiana.
i use a 900 mhz yagi pointed in the general direction of the towers... just keep tweaking the antenna for strongest signal....
 

WX9RLT

Top Dawg
Joined
Aug 18, 2006
Messages
680
Reaction score
195
Location
That one place...
2 story house with scanner in bedroom. I have been using a suction cup antenna on the window, but now it seems a lot weaker.

Make sure the antenna is on the outside of the window.

Friend of mine uses a J-pole, and brags about the reception he gets.
I would recommend using the ANALYZE feature as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wtp

wtp

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2008
Messages
7,267
Reaction score
2,998
Location
Port Charlotte FL
what you might not see...
some houses used what was called solar ply for roof plywood.
it had one face covered with aluminium foil, not good to get radio waves in the house.
then inside the walls a rigid insulation board with two sides of foil were used.
again, great to save on energy costs, but they reflect radio waves.
if your window looks like a mirror, it has metal in it VERY small particles of metal.
and you can figure out how good it is for radio/energy/heat reflection.
could you try the antenna outside the window for a few minutes to check reception ?
 

rf_patriot200

Active Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2024
Messages
1,228
Reaction score
1,025
Location
Freeport, Illinois
What's the best indoor antenna for the SDS200? I can't put anything outside. None of the whip antennas I've tried have worked on simulcast systems.
I know you said you can't stick anything outside, but a cheap and dirty idea is IF you don't have Double pane windows, then a Glass mount mobile scanner antenna would work much better. I think Scannermaster.com still markets some.
 

n8zcc

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
204
Reaction score
10
Location
Oakland, Michigan
I built a 1/4 wave ground plane, mounted it to the top of a wood dowl rod, and zip-tied the dowl to a lighting fixture. That solved the problem of getting a simulcast system not that far away from me. You can also pick up a small Yagi antenna from Amazon if you have a way to mount it.
 

trentbob

Silent Key W3BUX
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
6,929
Reaction score
8,208
Location
Bucks County, PA
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top