EAM's or FDM'S ? Both are coded messages, done intentionally. FDM's,are Force Direction Messages, predetermined OP-Plan Exercises. EAM's are specifically reserved and used for "Real Time Action", these coded messaages change constantly, self explanatory, for those who defend our Country.
Many hobbyist have adopted the habit (right or wrong) of calling any letter/figure coded voice traffic on the HF-GCS as “EAM” with the exception of the easily recognized Skykings. This is understandable as telling one kind of message traffic from another, when encrypted using the same techniques and similar structures, can be problematic. And the term “EAM” is well known, thanks to Hollywood, and is easy to apply.
Shoot, in this day of changing names and formats to be “current” we really do not have any idea if these messages still carry the same terms. Open source data is years behind today and today they may call them something else entirely and the format might have changed while externally appearing the same. People who know the actual information are probably not going to be talking, since confirmation of the current format, by a person with first hand access and information, would be at least FOUO, and likely above that.
I just accept the fact that people are going to call all similar traffic on the system an EAM and I don’t really worry about it. I almost never log such traffic myself unless there is something significant or amusing in it. I do hear it quite often, as one of the receivers at the house is almost always on an HF-GCS freq, but it is there to hear the other traffic, not the coded traffic.
T!