Site 424 Cedar Heights

[jimmnn]

FileVersion:4
-TowerInfo
#This section is here for information only. With the exception #of the Call Sign(s), This data is not Read back into the program at all.
System ID : 1E3
System Name : El Paso County
WACN : BEE00
Tower Number (Decimal): 424
Tower Number (Hex) : T0418
Tower Description : Cedar Heights (424)
Control Capabilities : Data,Voice,Registration
Call Sign(s) : WPUF980
Timestamp : Thu Jun 04 13:22:26 2009

-Tables
#Format: Table ID,Base Freq,Spacing,Input Offset,Assumed/Confirmed,BandWidth
00,851.00625,0.00625,-45.00000,"Confirmed",0.00625
01,762.00625,0.00625,30.00000,"Confirmed",0.00625

-Frequencies
#Format: Channel,Usage,Frequency,Input Frequency "00-0653","vi",855.08750,810.08750
"00-0929","v",856.81250,811.81250
"00-1105","av",857.91250,812.91250
"00-1249","av",858.81250,813.81250
"00-1409","a",859.81250,814.81250
"00-1569","c",860.81250,815.81250

-Neighbors
#Format: TowerID,TowerIDHex,System ID,Channel,Frequency,Tower Name 411,"T040B",1e3,"00-1437",859.98750,""
412,"T040C",1e3,"00-0433",853.71250,"T412 Stanley Canyon"
413,"T040D",1e3,"00-1433",859.96250,""
414,"T040E",1e3,"00-0451",853.82500,""
416,"T0410",1e3,"00-0461",853.88750,""
417,"T0411",1e3,"00-1317",859.23750,""
421,"T0415",1e3,"00-1349",859.43750,""
422,"T0416",1e3,"00-0837",856.23750,""

 

[PappyM12]

Looks like the admins have it listed under the State DTRS database. Should this not be under the El Paso County database?

Jim

 

[jimmnn]

Correct not part of DTRS yet and should be listed under Colorado Springs / El Paso County Public Safety.

http://www.radioreference.com/apps/db/?sid=2471

Jim<

 

[abqscan]

Woops! Just thinking about the future...

 

[jimmnn]

It's about 60 days away Erik is what I am hearing.

Jim<

 

[Warbirdhunter]

It's about 60 days away Erik is what I am hearing.

Jim<

60 days away from El Paso moving to the state system Jim? I thought they where trying to fight that move. I could be wrong just wondering.

 

[scanlist]

The current controlling authority of the EPSO/COS system made integration of their system into DTRS conditional as opposed to handing the system over and CCNC dictating what they can or cannot do like what happened to the former N. Colorado and Arapahoe County systems.

As mentioned by a person in the know some time back in this forum the feeling is they invested a lot of money for this system and they're not just going to give it away to the state and have no say on how the system will be used.

In other words they're not rolling over to the state with this agreement.

 

[Warbirdhunter]

The current controlling authority of the EPSO/COS system made integration of their system into DTRS conditional as opposed to handing the system over and CCNC dictating what they can or cannot do like what happened to the former N. Colorado and Arapahoe County systems.

As mentioned by a person in the know some time back in this forum the feeling is they invested a lot of money for this system and they're not just going to give it away to the state and have no say on how the system will be used.

In other words they're not rolling over to the state with this agreement.

I understand. Thanks Phil for taking time to respond. Hope you have a great weekend Sir!