"Snub Nose" dual band antenna for Yaesu small radio

Status
Not open for further replies.

emcomm

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Messages
276
Location
New York City - The Big Apple
I carry a small Yaesu FT-60r on the subway everyday into Manhattan and so I like a compact antenna. I picked up a Diamond SRH805S on ebay for a few bucks. It says 144/430 with wide band receive. I put it on the radio and can hit a repeater in Manhattan from Brooklyn (10 miles+/-). I also listen to the PD (which is on 470.xxx so it works great. I never loved an antenna before.

Anyone ever use one of these tiny antennas?
 

Attachments

  • IMAG2225.jpg
    IMAG2225.jpg
    62.9 KB · Views: 2,918
Last edited:

Rt169Radio

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Aug 24, 2011
Messages
2,960
Location
CT
Looks cool! How much power are you using when you transmit on 2m?
 

emcomm

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Messages
276
Location
New York City - The Big Apple
5 watts, but to be honest, I don't talk on it much, I monitor more. I carry it "just in case" I need to use it. It's like a pistol, you only carry it to fight your way back to your rifle.
 

W8RMH

Feed Provider Since 2012
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
8,110
Location
Grove City, OH (A Bearcat not a Buckeye)
Does your Comet work on 800? Doesn't need to be too sensitive... just looking for something stealthy for my 396.

Yes it does extremely well in my area. I bought it back in the 90's and have had it on several scanners.

Here is the CH-32's extended receive range:

118 -160 MHz.
250 - 290 MHz.
360 - 390 MHz.
420 - 470 MHz.
820 - 960 MHz.
1260 -1300 MHz.
 
Last edited:

RadioDaze

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Messages
2,034
Location
Orange County, California, USA
Yes it does extremely well in my area. I bought it back in the 90's and have had it on several scanners.

Here is the CH-32's extended receive range:

118 -160 MHz.
250 - 290 MHz.
360 - 390 MHz.
420 - 470 MHz.
820 - 960 MHz.
1260 -1300 MHz.

What, no VHF-Low? ;)
Guess I'll be ordering one.

emcomm, nothing against your suggestion. In fact, if you hadn't posted this thread, I might not have discovered these antennas, so thank you. Depending on availability, I may still end up with the Diamond.
 

gewecke

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Jan 29, 2006
Messages
7,452
Location
Illinois
I have been using this antenna for quite a while now:

Maldol MH-209 Amateur HT Antenna

I like it so much that I now own nine of them so far. I use them on both Amateur radios and scanners.

(I bought mine at HRO)

Mark

I use the maldol MH-255 and the MH-209 on my vx6r and they work great!
Fyi- the 255 is a commercial dual band antenna.

73,
n9zas
 

N4KVE

Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2003
Messages
4,126
Location
PALM BEACH, FLORIDA
These antennas are a compromise between compactness, & performance. I find when trying to use them on ham freq's, they don;t work so good, unless the repeater is nearby. Of course, when using these micro antennas to monitor a county wide system with tall towers, & multi sites, they work OK. So if you want maximum performance on ham repeaters, don't use these. But if compactness is the prime concern, & you don't care about performance, then they are OK. GARY N4KVE
 

traumacop

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
178
Location
Newark, Ohio
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.4; en-us; DROIDX Build/4.5.1_57_DX8-51) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1)

gewecke said:
I have been using this antenna for quite a while now:

Maldol MH-209 Amateur HT Antenna

I like it so much that I now own nine of them so far. I use them on both Amateur radios and scanners.

(I bought mine at HRO)

Mark

I use the maldol MH-255 and the MH-209 on my vx6r and they work great!
Fyi- the 255 is a commercial dual band antenna.

73,
n9zas

I have both the mh-209 & mh-255 and love them both. I sat in Universal and tried about every ht antenna they had on my ft-60 and the mh-209 performed very well compared to other stubby antennas.
 

gewecke

Completely Banned for the Greater Good
Banned
Joined
Jan 29, 2006
Messages
7,452
Location
Illinois
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.4; en-us; DROIDX Build/4.5.1_57_DX8-51) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1)



I have both the mh-209 & mh-255 and love them both. I sat in Universal and tried about every ht antenna they had on my ft-60 and the mh-209 performed very well compared to other stubby antennas.

Exactly! I haven't found a better one yet for my vx-6r :)

73,
n9zas
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top