• To anyone looking to acquire commercial radio programming software:

    Please do not make requests for copies of radio programming software which is sold (or was sold) by the manufacturer for any monetary value. All requests will be deleted and a forum infraction issued. Making a request such as this is attempting to engage in software piracy and this forum cannot be involved or associated with this activity. The same goes for any private transaction via Private Message. Even if you attempt to engage in this activity in PM's we will still enforce the forum rules. Your PM's are not private and the administration has the right to read them if there's a hint to criminal activity.

    If you are having trouble legally obtaining software please state so. We do not want any hurt feelings when your vague post is mistaken for a free request. It is YOUR responsibility to properly word your request.

    To obtain Motorola software see the Sticky in the Motorola forum.

    The various other vendors often permit their dealers to sell the software online (i.e., Kenwood). Please use Google or some other search engine to find a dealer that sells the software. Typically each series or individual radio requires its own software package. Often the Kenwood software is less than $100 so don't be a cheapskate; just purchase it.

    For M/A Com/Harris/GE, etc: there are two software packages that program all current and past radios. One package is for conventional programming and the other for trunked programming. The trunked package is in upwards of $2,500. The conventional package is more reasonable though is still several hundred dollars. The benefit is you do not need multiple versions for each radio (unlike Motorola).

    This is a large and very visible forum. We cannot jeopardize the ability to provide the RadioReference services by allowing this activity to occur. Please respect this.

So Cal idiots on 462.700 Kevin Bondy repeater

Status
Not open for further replies.

Project25_MASTR

Millennial Graying OBT Guy
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
4,209
Location
Texas
There was a time when men were men and sheep were scared.

We say that about College Station, TX all of the time (school rivalry jokes).

Want to figure out where the repeater likely is...just utilize a directional antenna and something with a decent signal display. Note the heading at the peak reading, move to a different location and try again. Then plot those two headings on a map. Where they intersect will give you a decent idea.
 

com501

Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Messages
1,617
Location
127.0.0.1
True. Of course, the real answer is 'vigilante enforcement', equally illegal, but potentially more satisfying to the participants. The FCC has no real teeth anymore due to so many budget cuts, and civil enforcement is a joke in cases like this.
 

Golay

Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2016
Messages
494
Effective elimination of a troll

This has been done in the past, and did work:

Make an audio recording of the foul language. Send a copy to the troll's neighbors, and to the local government. It was done in Metro Detroit to someone trolling a local two meter machine. Local law enforcement started stopping him and writing him up for every little thing. The code officers started fining him for code infractions at his house, and on his property, that they normally could care less about. The city just kept going into his wallet until he took his antennas down.

Yes, like someone said, the local government don't have jurisdiction in radio matters, but they can sure make your life miserable when they get a chubby against you.
 

N4GIX

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
May 27, 2015
Messages
2,124
Location
Hot Springs, AR
The only effective way to enforce the FCC's rules would be to make them criminal laws rather that civil rules.

Just recently someone has put up a duplex repeater on MURS #4 frequency. This person is brazen enough to use their GMRS call sign for the repeater ID. :confused:
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,368
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
This is in So Cal, mostly Los Angeles area. Nobody outside the radio world would care. If you gave or tried to give a copy of the foul language to a neighbor they would simply dump a load of foul language on you that would make the recordings seem like child's poems.

The conversation at your neighbors door would go something like "Hi, I would like you to listen to a recording of how your neighbor conducts himself on a two way radio". (Neighbor) "What da f***?, why are you at my f****** door bi***? Get your crazy mutha******* a** off my porch or I'll pop a cap in you. Bi***!" Fool!

Since the foul language is not a crime in CA, if you bothered the local police too much with it you would be on their radar for receiving some abuse. This would be purely an FCC problem, or if anyone was personally affected, a vigilante type situation.
prcguy

This has been done in the past, and did work:

Make an audio recording of the foul language. Send a copy to the troll's neighbors, and to the local government. It was done in Metro Detroit to someone trolling a local two meter machine. Local law enforcement started stopping him and writing him up for every little thing. The code officers started fining him for code infractions at his house, and on his property, that they normally could care less about. The city just kept going into his wallet until he took his antennas down.

Yes, like someone said, the local government don't have jurisdiction in radio matters, but they can sure make your life miserable when they get a chubby against you.
 

Chronic

Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
530
That repeater isn't on Oat.


"This case concerns intentional radio interference aimed at the licensed operations of The
Oaks Shopping Center (The Oaks) in Thousand Oaks, California.9 An investigation of the interference by the Enforcement Bureau’s Los Angeles Office (Los Angeles Office) on March 5, 2009, revealed an
unlicensed and unauthorized repeater transmitter in a secured radio communications facility on Oat
Mountain in the Santa Susana Mountains"

According to the PDF posted in post 1 of this thread References Oat Mountain.
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,368
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
An original transmitter or repeater from 2009 was on Oat Mountain but I don't think the current 462.700 repeater is on Oat. Wherever it is it covers much of LA and Orange County in So Cal.
prcguy

"This case concerns intentional radio interference aimed at the licensed operations of The
Oaks Shopping Center (The Oaks) in Thousand Oaks, California.9 An investigation of the interference by the Enforcement Bureau’s Los Angeles Office (Los Angeles Office) on March 5, 2009, revealed an
unlicensed and unauthorized repeater transmitter in a secured radio communications facility on Oat
Mountain in the Santa Susana Mountains"

According to the PDF posted in post 1 of this thread References Oat Mountain.
 

Project25_MASTR

Millennial Graying OBT Guy
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
4,209
Location
Texas
What about taking the foul language recordings to the local news outlets? Thinking here is millions of children's parents purchased their kids blister pack radios…hearing that language out of them could change things up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

n1das

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2003
Messages
1,601
Location
Nashua, NH
What about taking the foul language recordings to the local news outlets? Thinking here is millions of children's parents purchased their kids blister pack radios…hearing that language out of them could change things up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
LOL. Send in Lois Lane, Jimmy Olsen, and Clark Kent to investigate and if necessary, call Superman. :)


Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
 

lmrtek

Active Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
534
what do you expect om the land of "free speech" repeaters

ham radio repeaters that sound worse than CB EVER did

constant keying over top of each other, constant foul language, threats of violence sexual harassment, etc etc etc

the k6mwt repeater is a collection of the worst of the worst

the kf6phx repeater has also turned into a world wide embarrassment to ham radio
 

prcguy

Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2006
Messages
15,368
Location
So Cal - Richardson, TX - Tewksbury, MA
Most of the people on the GMRS repeater in question have all the worst attributes of the k6mwt repeater trash, but are far too stupid to pass a ham test. I don't know how they can even figure out how to operate the amateur radios they use illegally on GMRS.
prcguy

what do you expect om the land of "free speech" repeaters

ham radio repeaters that sound worse than CB EVER did

constant keying over top of each other, constant foul language, threats of violence sexual harassment, etc etc etc

the k6mwt repeater is a collection of the worst of the worst

the kf6phx repeater has also turned into a world wide embarrassment to ham radio
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,416
Location
VA
What about taking the foul language recordings to the local news outlets? Thinking here is millions of children's parents purchased their kids blister pack radios…hearing that language out of them could change things up.

LOL @ this. Have you visited a public school lately? Walk down the hall and you'll probably hear more f-words than most R-rated movies.
 

Project25_MASTR

Millennial Graying OBT Guy
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
4,209
Location
Texas
LOL @ this. Have you visited a public school lately? Walk down the hall and you'll probably hear more f-words than most R-rated movies.



Oh yea. However, how much if that activity actually occurs around the parents? Especially when talking about elementary agents students?

Depending on location, some parents are more over-protective about the language heard by their children than others. What's sad, some areas would happily run with those stories (I've actually seen it happen in they last few years).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

jonwienke

More Info Coming Soon!
Joined
Jul 18, 2014
Messages
13,416
Location
VA
For better or worse, the cultural taboo against juvenile profanity has severely eroded over the last few decades.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top