I wrote in another thread, but my posts were removed, so I wrote the following:
I wrote about the fact that suddenly charging additional for a subscription here might violate agreements with software makers (Butel, Win96. etc), being that purchasers of that software assumed that their initial subscription with RR would be sufficient for their software to interface with the application. Some poeple pay up to $99 for the software, expecting it to perform as described. I wrote that this might constitute a breech in contract or even false adverstising for the makers of the software. I wrote that before any final decision is made to start charging additional fees to access the needed features at RR, this issue need be resolved. I also wrote that if the additional fees were not retroactive would be a sound resolution to this and other problems arising from need to increase the fee to access RR features.
I also wrote that I do not have a problem with the fee hike, and will pay the necessary fees; only that I feel it should not be retroactiive for the reasons described above. I wrote that I fully support Linday's website and his sacrifice and dedication to it.
Again, I am not sure why my posts were removed. Was this a major issue that "someone" didn't want others to view?
Planning to send in my payment soon!
I wrote about the fact that suddenly charging additional for a subscription here might violate agreements with software makers (Butel, Win96. etc), being that purchasers of that software assumed that their initial subscription with RR would be sufficient for their software to interface with the application. Some poeple pay up to $99 for the software, expecting it to perform as described. I wrote that this might constitute a breech in contract or even false adverstising for the makers of the software. I wrote that before any final decision is made to start charging additional fees to access the needed features at RR, this issue need be resolved. I also wrote that if the additional fees were not retroactive would be a sound resolution to this and other problems arising from need to increase the fee to access RR features.
I also wrote that I do not have a problem with the fee hike, and will pay the necessary fees; only that I feel it should not be retroactiive for the reasons described above. I wrote that I fully support Linday's website and his sacrifice and dedication to it.
Again, I am not sure why my posts were removed. Was this a major issue that "someone" didn't want others to view?
Planning to send in my payment soon!