WX9RLT
Top Dawg
TG 36595
Encrypted
Rockford area
853.6375
Oct 25th 8:57am
Encrypted
Rockford area
853.6375
Oct 25th 8:57am
Barrington FD alsoFound an article today saying Barrington PD will be joining NWCD
Found an article today saying Barrington PD will be joining NWCD
Here's the archived version, in case one needs to go around a pesky pay wall:
Thanks for the info, the database has been updated.Anyway, staying on the topic of SC21, I noticed that a couple of talkgroups on the Cook Co node are now Phase II when they previously weren't. While I don't have a complete list, on site 5-002 (using Unitrunker), I noticed that WC3 Police Dispatch (TG 25133) and SouthCom (TG 25009) were Phase II as of last week. Not sure when it started, but thought it's worth noting.
I've been hearing ISPERN VHF traffic being patched on the District-Chicago Priority talk group (TGID 9051) over the past couple of days.
I heard that chase and was thinking the same thing. During a car chase is not the time for an officer to have to change radios to hear the helo providing air support. ISP Chicago should have the ability to patch their VHF receive to Chicago Priority.For some reason this was disabled shortly after it was implemented. It sure would have been helpful last night with CPD's PH-1 in the air.
I heard that chase and was thinking the same thing. During a car chase is not the time for an officer to have to change radios to hear the helo providing air support. ISP Chicago should have the ability to patch their VHF receive to Chicago Priority.
For some reason this was disabled shortly after it was implemented. It sure would have been helpful last night with CPD's PH-1 in the air.
I heard that chase and was thinking the same thing. During a car chase is not the time for an officer to have to change radios to hear the helo providing air support. ISP Chicago should have the ability to patch their VHF receive to Chicago Priority.
They used the patch briefly, and didn't understand why they disabled it. Hinsdale had to handle the Chicago mess..LOL!
Does anyone know why the patch isn't activated 24/7? Seems like it should be a no-brainer, but if someone could enlighten me (and everyone else) that'd be great.
Is anyone familiar with SC21 Site 106 (Albany, Whiteside County)? I was traveling through that area few weeks ago and had the freqs listed in the RR database for this site programmed in my SDS100. My notes show that the scanner displayed a Site ID of 1-14 with an NAC of 4C0. Didn't happen to note which freq the control channel was on at the time or the system ID. I don't believe I heard any traffic on that site, and there is already an SC21 site 114 currently listed in the database at Providence in Bureau County.
The database lists five 700 MHz and one 800 MHz freq for this site. Is it even possible to have both 700 and 800 MHz freqs in use at the same site?
Possible that the scanner was seeing a site from another system?
Thanks for the catch, Shep! An updated list of freqs for site SC21 Site 106 (all of them different than those that were listed for the site at the time) was submitted to Radio Reference in July 2019. Before that, at least one of the freqs listed for this site was actually in use for ISICS Site 114 across the river. The Radio Reference database and the Uniden master database were updated, but my SDS100's SC21 Favorites List wasn't.114 with 4C0 is the ISICS, Iowa system. Scott county site.
Greg