StarCom21 2023 Official Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,147
Location
Chicago , IL
About1:30 today I heard " B for the detail" that's why I questioned you , I'm paying much closer attention, the other day I heard 1995 on 9068 c-c also and took two tries to get a answer,... The ramp to i80 Chicago St here in Joliet where 1995 hangs out is closed causing problems....The whole i80 is a mess thru Joliet and west cause of road work.
I'm glad you got your ears on it to. I just listened to the recording numerous times, and it sounded like B-Detail. I'm thinking he's referring to both old and new programming. As you probably know up here, some are still calling it District Chicago or District 15 while the rest of the troops by their new numbers. Old habits..
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,147
Location
Chicago , IL
I'm glad you got your ears on it to. I just listened to the recording numerous times, and it sounded like B-Detail. I'm thinking he's referring to both old and new programming. As you probably know up here, some are still calling it District Chicago or District 15 while the rest of the troops by their new numbers. Old habits..
Is DC-B still TG 9006 just heard some cars told to go to "B" ,...TY

About1:30 today I heard " B for the detail" that's why I questioned you , I'm paying much closer attention, the other day I heard 1995 on 9068 c-c also and took two tries to get a answer,... The ramp to i80 Chicago St here in Joliet where 1995 hangs out is closed causing problems....The whole i80 is a mess thru Joliet and west cause of road work.
As I've posted, channel/talkgroup name changes have yet to be confirmed. I edit my talkgroup names based on what I'm hearing at the time. I'm more interested in what was being used vs. what's no longer being used which confirms the reprogramming changes are in the works in Troop 3. They have alot of units to reprogram, so I don't expect to hear everyone with the new channel names yet. The sergeant was giving the Chicago operator a little information which I'm sure was correct. I'm also sure the troopers have updated channel assignments memos to avoid confusion. What I do know is DC-B previously wasn't monitored by the Chicago Dispatchers, then in the past week or so it was. Tac-1 used to be used for these traffic missions, but with the new programming it would appear these talkgroups/channels are no longer in the code plugs. When they used to have out of district details on the South expressways, many didn't have the District-Chicago code plugs and they figured that Tac-3 was common and it was patched. That appears to be what's happening on the "old" Tac-2/"new" Detail channel. The "old" District 5 car-to-car channel will be one to listen for. As we heard, some didn't answer when IDOT 1995 called, and makes me wonder if that car to car channel is also being eliminated? I don't have answers, or nothing was sent to me that I can submit as a confirmed change.
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,147
Location
Chicago , IL
On TG 9014 she just said all Tac units switch to DC-B , I presume that’s TG 9006
Yes it is. This is the 2nd time a Southwest Patrol traffic enforcement detail was on the "old" DC-B, and not on "old" D5-B. It would be a safe bet all details will be on 9006. North, Middle, South, Southwest, Admin, ISPERN, 3-Car to Car, 3-Detail (DC-B) confirmed to be in the new talkgroup line up. Tac-2 and Tac-3 being used as patches. Haven't heard any of the newly programmed radios on my list on the "old" D5-Car to Car, but am still hearing traffic.

I heard another trooper being told to be at the radio lab the next morning. Also heard that last night. Probably trying to get them all on the same code plug by the Memorial Day weekend. Going to be a warm one Skilling says.
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,147
Location
Chicago , IL
"...can you tell me what channel the detail is on?"...."you'll be on 5B, unless if you're radio's been reprogrammed, it'll be 3-B5". Radio traffic heard on TGID 9014...now confirmed.
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,147
Location
Chicago , IL
1-63 didn't have 3-B5 for a detail, so used the Troop 3-Southwest channel. 3-62 couldn't communicate with IDOT 1996 on the "old" D-5 Car-to-Car because his radio hasn't been reprogrammed, and some of the units (AIR-6 in particular) on the Troop 15 detail didn't have 15-Central talkgroup (2028), so the "new" EMA Calling/ "old" Ops-North A talkgroup (30300) was patched together. Other than that, the reprogramming is going well up here in Troop 3/Troop 15 :LOL: :LOL:
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,147
Location
Chicago , IL
Those that are following and documenting radio ID's, I've made note of the motorcycles are changing the pattern a bit. Troops 2,5,6 have been affiliating with the DuPage/Cook sites since the weekend, and have been seeing 205xxxx & 206xxxx radio ID's for the motorcycles. Previously have been seeing 140xxxx/ 240xxxx / 340xxxx with the x's denoting the badge/star numbers and the first number denoting the zone they're assigned. These might be new motorcycles and I suspect the license plates are reflecting the radio ID's. I'm still seeing some of the old radio ID structure for those troopers previously assigned a motorcycle, and this might be part of the "radio reprogramming?"
 

Elpato

Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
75
Those that are following and documenting radio ID's, I've made note of the motorcycles are changing the pattern a bit. Troops 2,5,6 have been affiliating with the DuPage/Cook sites since the weekend, and have been seeing 205xxxx & 206xxxx radio ID's for the motorcycles. Previously have been seeing 140xxxx/ 240xxxx / 340xxxx with the x's denoting the badge/star numbers and the first number denoting the zone they're assigned. These might be new motorcycles and I suspect the license plates are reflecting the radio ID's. I'm still seeing some of the old radio ID structure for those troopers previously assigned a motorcycle, and this might be part of the "radio reprogramming?"
They did something to their bikes, one guy was saying his computer, printer, and radio were dead, when he checked the fuses they had 5amp fuses (supposed to be 10-15amp) and had to find an auto part store to change them out.
Complete snafu.
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,147
Location
Chicago , IL
They did something to their bikes, one guy was saying his computer, printer, and radio were dead, when he checked the fuses they had 5amp fuses (supposed to be 10-15amp) and had to find an auto part store to change them out.
Complete snafu.
They have computers and printers on motorcycles? I'd like to see how that looks.
 

Elpato

Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2007
Messages
75
They have computers and printers on motorcycles? I'd like to see how that looks.
Probably tucked in the saddle if I had to guess.. I couldn't tell if they were all bike units or not when they came down 90, telephoto lens on my drone ain't that great in low light. But they had at least 4 on the escort tonight.
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,147
Location
Chicago , IL
they have small toughbooks and thermal printers in the cargo box. They are mounted on top of the low power APX mobile
That makes sense. When I read computer, I was thinking of a PDT on a motorcycle that might be a little distracting.
 

RoninJoliet

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
3,455
Location
ILL
So it seems there getting rid of all the channel "B" TGs for other purposes??, also TR-3 (D5) car yesterday can't talk to ID 1996 cause his radio is not upgraded so wonder what TG will they use for that , 1996 is pretty busy with the mess here in Joliet with I80 mess,....
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,147
Location
Chicago , IL
1-63 didn't have 3-B5 for a detail, so used the Troop 3-Southwest channel. 3-62 couldn't communicate with IDOT 1996 on the "old" D-5 Car-to-Car because his radio hasn't been reprogrammed, and some of the units (AIR-6 in particular) on the Troop 15 detail didn't have 15-Central talkgroup (2028), so the "new" EMA Calling/ "old" Ops-North A talkgroup (30300) was patched together. Other than that, the reprogramming is going well up here in Troop 3/Troop 15 :LOL: :LOL:

So it seems there getting rid of all the channel "B" TGs for other purposes??, also TR-3 (D5) car yesterday can't talk to ID 1996 cause his radio is not upgraded so wonder what TG will they use for that , 1996 is pretty busy with the mess here in Joliet with I80 mess,....
I wouldn't say they're getting rid of them, just not being used as before. 3-62 is an "old" District-Chicago trooper, and probably never had the D5 Car-to-Car channel. As far as the "old" D5-B channel, it appears to be used exclusively for details in the Southwest Patrol area, which makes sense since Troop 3 can run concurrent details in two areas on separate channels. The "old" DC-B is used frequently for details in the North, South , and Middle Patrol areas. I haven't heard much on the "old" D2-B or D2-C talkgroups with the occasional "oops, I'm on the wrong channel". I've infrequently heard the "old" D2 Car-to-Car used with H-541 during a overweight enforcement detail awhile back. I have them all programmed in ID Scan mode to keep track of any changes.
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,147
Location
Chicago , IL
I wouldn't say they're getting rid of them, just not being used as before. 3-62 is an "old" District-Chicago trooper, and probably never had the D5 Car-to-Car channel. As far as the "old" D5-B channel, it appears to be used exclusively for details in the Southwest Patrol area, which makes sense since Troop 3 can run concurrent details in two areas on separate channels. The "old" DC-B is used frequently for details in the North, South , and Middle Patrol areas. I haven't heard much on the "old" D2-B or D2-C talkgroups with the occasional "oops, I'm on the wrong channel". I've infrequently heard the "old" D2 Car-to-Car used with H-541 during a overweight enforcement detail awhile back. I have them all programmed in ID Scan mode to keep track of any changes.

This morning they had some confusion. Troop 3 is working a traffic enforcement detail in the "old" District 2/5 area. Some landed on the 3-Detail SW ("old" D5-B), then were corrected and sent to 3-Detail ("old" DC-B), where it's occurring now.

It also "appears" the Telecommunicators got the memo about using the correct terminology by saying Troop 3 or Troop 15. "Attention District-Chicago, um Troop 3 units......". "All District 15, I mean Troop 15 units 10-41 check..."
 

werinshades

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
6,147
Location
Chicago , IL
Troop 3 continued on their two detail channels only throughout Memorial Day week/weekend. Occasional transmissions still being patched from Tac-3 to 3-South talkgroup. Other Tac and Detail channels and 2-B, 2-C have been silent.

"2-R-2, Chicago on 3-A (9005)". He was asking the "old" C-79 to call him at the radio lab using the "new" talkgroup/channel text tag.

Troop 15's radio techs were updating the Toll Plazas radios over the past week. Radio ID's185xx (x's denoting toll plaza number), seems to be the change. The old configuration I have is 113xx's.
 

RoninJoliet

Member
Premium Subscriber
Joined
Jan 14, 2003
Messages
3,455
Location
ILL
Heard a semi on fire on i55 with Wiimington FD respond , they told there dispatch "they will call ISP on "Local" that the semi is well off he road ....I scrolled to 9059-local and there they were and actually only took two call outs to get a dispatcher...I think that's the first time I ever heard "Local" used....
 

kevino

Database Administrator
Database Admin
Joined
Jan 6, 2005
Messages
962
Location
Chicagoland
Logged a new TG (34993) via Unitrunker, wondering if anyone knows what it's used for. Guessing that it is a Kankakee County TG. Encrypted transmission by ISP RID 1106382, affiliation by what might be a Bourbonnais PD RID 196911. Both logged on Site 101 (DuPage County) last Thursday.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top