click23 said:Do you think that refletor at the end has anything to do with it?
I don't think you can say at this point that you should replace the the RG58. It couldn't hurt but that yagi is going to make a big difference from your mag mount with its own (likely) crummy cable.Click23 said:Should I replace the 20' section of RG58? I am planning on usig RG6QS, will this work or should I get something better?
rdra90 said:Okay guys, just how directional is a good Yagi??? I need to hit two different 800mhz trunked systems - basically in the same direction *but* not identical degree angles from my monitoring location. Can I "split the difference"; e.g. point the yagi halfway between the two towers - or does that blow the advantage of the yagi and I'm better off trying to get a better omnidirectional discone for 800mhz? I don't really want to blow $100 on a yagi if it's not going to buy my anything. Your advice would be appreciated.
rdra90 said:Thanks guys - I guess should have also indicated that these are APCO P-25 digital systems. So I have to translate your "scratchy" gain guidelines to degrees of "cats in the blender" sounds. The tips re: low-high gain were helpful but I have to say that there will definitely be more than a couple of degrees separation in the direction. My concern is that I'll point between the systems and suck in never-never land as opposed to either system. Oh well, more head scratching.... I'm leaning now toward a better quality discone than the RS 20-176 I have - probably will look for one that's tuned for 800mhz. If you have any suggestions, I'd love to hear them.
rdra90 said:What I have now is a RS 20-176 (http://www.radioshack.com/product.a...me=CTLG_008_009_010_001&product_id=20-176) mounted 10' above roofline on a standard single-story home. 50 feet of RG-58 with PL connectors on each end. A PL-to-BNC adapter on the radio end (296d). Flat terrain; closest 800mhz system tower about 10 mi. away. It works just fine on VHF-UHF, but when they converted some systems to 800mhz digital; the antenna just doesn't hack it. I do monitor everything from Low VHF (air) to 800 mhz so I don't want to dump the other bands but am willing to take some analog degradation down there to get better digital audio at the 800 end (e.g. I can live with scratchy analog but when your digital drops out, well, I don't need to tell you--it's cats in the blender). The reception on 800 digital is variable - at best it's fair-to-middlin' and most of the time, it's fair to poor. So, I don't think I need a ton of additional gain. When I switched to an 800mhz rubber ducky, it definitely improved the portable results - if I could get the same improvement on the base side, I'd be a happy camper.
rdra90 said:Thanks for the scoop. I've seen alot of discussion about cable. Sounds like best bet is to use only the maximum amount of cable needed and to use your own connectors; vs. precut lengths with connectors attached. Better to go short on cable with manually crimped connectors vs. using extra feet of unneeded cable just to get factory crimped connectors. Any specific type of cable you would recommend? I'm looking probably at needing about 35-40 feet. This whole thing sound like the audio gear analogy. You can have the best amp (antenna) in the world but if the speakers (antenna cable) suck, so will the sound.
click23 said:Has anyone tried THIS "super" yagi? They are claiming 24dBi,21.9dBd!!!!??? If my math is right this would be a 1550% increase in signal strength. Just wanting know you guys think about it.